Chile vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Land use hidden — Other areas, per capita

Chile
0.0229 Square kilometres per person
in 2023
Turks and Caicos Islands
0.0181 Square kilometres per person
in 2023
Chile rank
21st
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
24th

Land use hidden — Other areas, per capita over time

  • Chile
  • Turks and Caicos Islands
00.050.10.15196119922023

How they compare

Chile currently reports 0.0229 Square kilometres per person against 0.0181 Square kilometres per person in Turks and Caicos Islands, a difference of 0.0048 Square kilometres per person.

That makes Chile's figure about 1.3 times Turks and Caicos Islands's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.

Chile ranks 21st and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 24th of 181 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 2 and Turks and Caicos Islands in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Turks and Caicos Islands Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0671 Square kilometres per person 0.1664 Square kilometres per person 0.0993 Square kilometres per person Turks and Caicos Islands
1970s 0.055 Square kilometres per person 0.1477 Square kilometres per person 0.0928 Square kilometres per person Turks and Caicos Islands
1980s 0.047 Square kilometres per person 0.1023 Square kilometres per person 0.0552 Square kilometres per person Turks and Caicos Islands
1990s 0.0302 Square kilometres per person 0.0577 Square kilometres per person 0.0275 Square kilometres per person Turks and Caicos Islands
2000s 0.0262 Square kilometres per person 0.0362 Square kilometres per person 0.01 Square kilometres per person Turks and Caicos Islands
2010s 0.0242 Square kilometres per person 0.0235 Square kilometres per person 0.0007 Square kilometres per person Chile
2020s 0.0231 Square kilometres per person 0.0184 Square kilometres per person 0.0047 Square kilometres per person Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher land use hidden — other areas, per capita, Chile or Turks and Caicos Islands?
Chile, at 0.0229 Square kilometres per person against 0.0181 Square kilometres per person in Turks and Caicos Islands as of 2023.
What is the difference in land use hidden — other areas, per capita between Chile and Turks and Caicos Islands?
0.0048 Square kilometres per person, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Turks and Caicos Islands?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Chile and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for land use hidden — other areas, per capita?
Chile ranks 21st and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 24th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Land use hidden — Other areas, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Land use hidden — Other areas, per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 01 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-other-areas-per-capita/chile/turks-and-caicos-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-other-areas-per-capita/chile/turks-and-caicos-islands/">Chile vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Land use hidden — Other areas, per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Land use hidden — Other areas, per capita
Unit
Square kilometres per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 10,717 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Land use hidden — Other areas divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.