Hungary vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Land use hidden — Other areas, per capita

Hungary
0.0021 Square kilometres per person
in 2023
Saint Kitts and Nevis
0.0019 Square kilometres per person
in 2023
Hungary rank
93rd
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
94th

Land use hidden — Other areas, per capita over time

  • Hungary
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
0.0010.0020.0030.0040.005196119922023

How they compare

Hungary currently reports 0.0021 Square kilometres per person against 0.0019 Square kilometres per person in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 0.0002 Square kilometres per person.

That makes Hungary's figure about 1.1 times Saint Kitts and Nevis's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.

Hungary ranks 93rd and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 94th of 181 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Hungary averaged higher in 1 and Saint Kitts and Nevis in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hungary Saint Kitts and Nevis Difference Ahead
1960s 0.002 Square kilometres per person 0.003 Square kilometres per person 0.001 Square kilometres per person Saint Kitts and Nevis
1970s 0.0021 Square kilometres per person 0.0046 Square kilometres per person 0.0025 Square kilometres per person Saint Kitts and Nevis
1980s 0.0023 Square kilometres per person 0.0031 Square kilometres per person 0.0008 Square kilometres per person Saint Kitts and Nevis
1990s 0.0009 Square kilometres per person 0.0011 Square kilometres per person 0.0002 Square kilometres per person Saint Kitts and Nevis
2000s 0.0011 Square kilometres per person 0.0018 Square kilometres per person 0.0006 Square kilometres per person Saint Kitts and Nevis
2010s 0.0018 Square kilometres per person 0.0019 Square kilometres per person 0.0001 Square kilometres per person Saint Kitts and Nevis
2020s 0.0021 Square kilometres per person 0.0019 Square kilometres per person 0.0002 Square kilometres per person Hungary

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher land use hidden — other areas, per capita, Hungary or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
Hungary, at 0.0021 Square kilometres per person against 0.0019 Square kilometres per person in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2023.
What is the difference in land use hidden — other areas, per capita between Hungary and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
0.0002 Square kilometres per person, with Hungary ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Hungary and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for land use hidden — other areas, per capita?
Hungary ranks 93rd and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 94th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Land use hidden — Other areas, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hungary vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Land use hidden — Other areas, per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 01 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-other-areas-per-capita/hungary/st-kitts-and-nevis/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-other-areas-per-capita/hungary/st-kitts-and-nevis/">Hungary vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Land use hidden — Other areas, per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Land use hidden — Other areas, per capita
Unit
Square kilometres per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 10,717 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Land use hidden — Other areas divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.