Aruba vs Iceland: Land use hidden — Other areas, per square kilometre

Aruba
0.8656 Square kilometres per square kilometre
in 2023
Iceland
0.8323 Square kilometres per square kilometre
in 2023
Aruba rank
15th
Iceland rank
16th

Land use hidden — Other areas, per square kilometre over time

  • Aruba
  • Iceland
00.20.40.60.8196119922023

How they compare

Aruba currently reports 0.8656 Square kilometres per square kilometre against 0.8323 Square kilometres per square kilometre in Iceland, a difference of 0.0333 Square kilometres per square kilometre.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Aruba has been ahead every year.

Aruba ranks 15th and Iceland ranks 16th of 181 countries.

Aruba has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Aruba Iceland Difference Ahead
1960s 0.8889 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.7885 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.1004 Square kilometres per square kilometre Aruba
1970s 0.8889 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.8049 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.084 Square kilometres per square kilometre Aruba
1980s 0.8889 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.8105 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0784 Square kilometres per square kilometre Aruba
1990s 0.8656 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.8085 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0571 Square kilometres per square kilometre Aruba
2000s 0.8656 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.8086 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.057 Square kilometres per square kilometre Aruba
2010s 0.8656 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.8087 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0569 Square kilometres per square kilometre Aruba
2020s 0.8656 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.815 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0506 Square kilometres per square kilometre Aruba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher land use hidden — other areas, per square kilometre, Aruba or Iceland?
Aruba, at 0.8656 Square kilometres per square kilometre against 0.8323 Square kilometres per square kilometre in Iceland as of 2023.
What is the difference in land use hidden — other areas, per square kilometre between Aruba and Iceland?
0.0333 Square kilometres per square kilometre, with Aruba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Iceland?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Aruba and Iceland rank globally for land use hidden — other areas, per square kilometre?
Aruba ranks 15th and Iceland ranks 16th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Land use hidden — Other areas, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Aruba vs Iceland: Land use hidden — Other areas, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 01 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-other-areas-per-square-kilometre/aruba/iceland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-other-areas-per-square-kilometre/aruba/iceland/">Aruba vs Iceland: Land use hidden — Other areas, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Land use hidden — Other areas, per square kilometre
Unit
Square kilometres per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 10,717 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Land use hidden — Other areas divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.