Bangladesh vs Rwanda: Land use hidden — Other areas, per square kilometre

Bangladesh
0.132 Square kilometres per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda
0.1236 Square kilometres per square kilometre
in 2023
Bangladesh rank
140th
Rwanda rank
142nd

Land use hidden — Other areas, per square kilometre over time

  • Bangladesh
  • Rwanda
0.10.20.30.40.5196119922023

How they compare

Bangladesh currently reports 0.132 Square kilometres per square kilometre against 0.1236 Square kilometres per square kilometre in Rwanda, a difference of 0.0084 Square kilometres per square kilometre.

That makes Bangladesh's figure about 1.1 times Rwanda's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Rwanda ahead.

Bangladesh ranks 140th and Rwanda ranks 142nd of 181 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Bangladesh averaged higher in 3 and Rwanda in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bangladesh Rwanda Difference Ahead
1960s 0.2635 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.4507 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.1872 Square kilometres per square kilometre Rwanda
1970s 0.237 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.3619 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.1249 Square kilometres per square kilometre Rwanda
1980s 0.2239 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.2685 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0446 Square kilometres per square kilometre Rwanda
1990s 0.1146 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.1845 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0699 Square kilometres per square kilometre Rwanda
2000s 0.1379 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.1253 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0126 Square kilometres per square kilometre Bangladesh
2010s 0.1497 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0929 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0568 Square kilometres per square kilometre Bangladesh
2020s 0.1316 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.095 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0366 Square kilometres per square kilometre Bangladesh

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher land use hidden — other areas, per square kilometre, Bangladesh or Rwanda?
Bangladesh, at 0.132 Square kilometres per square kilometre against 0.1236 Square kilometres per square kilometre in Rwanda as of 2023.
What is the difference in land use hidden — other areas, per square kilometre between Bangladesh and Rwanda?
0.0084 Square kilometres per square kilometre, with Bangladesh ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Rwanda?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Bangladesh and Rwanda rank globally for land use hidden — other areas, per square kilometre?
Bangladesh ranks 140th and Rwanda ranks 142nd of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Land use hidden — Other areas, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bangladesh vs Rwanda: Land use hidden — Other areas, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 01 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-other-areas-per-square-kilometre/bangladesh/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-other-areas-per-square-kilometre/bangladesh/rwanda/">Bangladesh vs Rwanda: Land use hidden — Other areas, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Land use hidden — Other areas, per square kilometre
Unit
Square kilometres per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 10,717 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Land use hidden — Other areas divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.