Bangladesh vs Zimbabwe: Land use hidden — Other areas, per square kilometre

Bangladesh
0.132 Square kilometres per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0.1347 Square kilometres per square kilometre
in 2023
Bangladesh rank
140th
Zimbabwe rank
138th

Land use hidden — Other areas, per square kilometre over time

  • Bangladesh
  • Zimbabwe
00.20.40.60.8196119922023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 0.1347 Square kilometres per square kilometre against 0.132 Square kilometres per square kilometre in Bangladesh, a difference of 0.0027 Square kilometres per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Bangladesh ranks 140th and Zimbabwe ranks 138th of 181 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Bangladesh averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bangladesh Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 0.2635 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.7339 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.4704 Square kilometres per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1970s 0.237 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.7102 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.4733 Square kilometres per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1980s 0.2239 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.6814 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.4575 Square kilometres per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1990s 0.1146 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.1632 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0485 Square kilometres per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s 0.1379 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.1212 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0167 Square kilometres per square kilometre Bangladesh
2010s 0.1497 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.1239 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0258 Square kilometres per square kilometre Bangladesh
2020s 0.1316 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.1328 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0012 Square kilometres per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher land use hidden — other areas, per square kilometre, Bangladesh or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 0.1347 Square kilometres per square kilometre against 0.132 Square kilometres per square kilometre in Bangladesh as of 2023.
What is the difference in land use hidden — other areas, per square kilometre between Bangladesh and Zimbabwe?
0.0027 Square kilometres per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Zimbabwe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Bangladesh and Zimbabwe rank globally for land use hidden — other areas, per square kilometre?
Bangladesh ranks 140th and Zimbabwe ranks 138th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Land use hidden — Other areas, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bangladesh vs Zimbabwe: Land use hidden — Other areas, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 01 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-other-areas-per-square-kilometre/bangladesh/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-other-areas-per-square-kilometre/bangladesh/zimbabwe/">Bangladesh vs Zimbabwe: Land use hidden — Other areas, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Land use hidden — Other areas, per square kilometre
Unit
Square kilometres per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 10,717 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Land use hidden — Other areas divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.