Barbados vs Chad: Land use hidden — Other areas, per square kilometre

Barbados
0.6209 Square kilometres per square kilometre
in 2023
Chad
0.5686 Square kilometres per square kilometre
in 2023
Barbados rank
30th
Chad rank
33rd

Land use hidden — Other areas, per square kilometre over time

  • Barbados
  • Chad
00.20.40.6196119922023

How they compare

Barbados currently reports 0.6209 Square kilometres per square kilometre against 0.5686 Square kilometres per square kilometre in Chad, a difference of 0.0523 Square kilometres per square kilometre.

That makes Barbados's figure about 1.1 times Chad's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Chad ahead.

Barbados ranks 30th and Chad ranks 33rd of 181 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 2 and Chad in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados Chad Difference Ahead
1960s 0.5581 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.6198 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0617 Square kilometres per square kilometre Chad
1970s 0.5581 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.6189 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0608 Square kilometres per square kilometre Chad
1980s 0.5581 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.6174 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0592 Square kilometres per square kilometre Chad
1990s 0.414 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.563 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.1491 Square kilometres per square kilometre Chad
2000s 0.4674 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.5645 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0971 Square kilometres per square kilometre Chad
2010s 0.5802 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.5634 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0168 Square kilometres per square kilometre Barbados
2020s 0.6209 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.5673 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0536 Square kilometres per square kilometre Barbados

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher land use hidden — other areas, per square kilometre, Barbados or Chad?
Barbados, at 0.6209 Square kilometres per square kilometre against 0.5686 Square kilometres per square kilometre in Chad as of 2023.
What is the difference in land use hidden — other areas, per square kilometre between Barbados and Chad?
0.0523 Square kilometres per square kilometre, with Barbados ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Chad?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Barbados and Chad rank globally for land use hidden — other areas, per square kilometre?
Barbados ranks 30th and Chad ranks 33rd of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Land use hidden — Other areas, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs Chad: Land use hidden — Other areas, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 01 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-other-areas-per-square-kilometre/barbados/chad/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-other-areas-per-square-kilometre/barbados/chad/">Barbados vs Chad: Land use hidden — Other areas, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Land use hidden — Other areas, per square kilometre
Unit
Square kilometres per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 10,717 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Land use hidden — Other areas divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.