Bhutan vs Zimbabwe: Land use hidden — Other areas, per square kilometre

Bhutan
0.1458 Square kilometres per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0.1347 Square kilometres per square kilometre
in 2023
Bhutan rank
135th
Zimbabwe rank
138th

Land use hidden — Other areas, per square kilometre over time

  • Bhutan
  • Zimbabwe
0.20.40.60.81196119922023

How they compare

Bhutan currently reports 0.1458 Square kilometres per square kilometre against 0.1347 Square kilometres per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.0111 Square kilometres per square kilometre.

That makes Bhutan's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Bhutan has been ahead every year.

Bhutan ranks 135th and Zimbabwe ranks 138th of 181 countries.

Bhutan has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bhutan Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 0.9217 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.7339 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.1878 Square kilometres per square kilometre Bhutan
1970s 0.9161 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.7102 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.2058 Square kilometres per square kilometre Bhutan
1980s 0.9062 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.6814 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.2248 Square kilometres per square kilometre Bhutan
1990s 0.27 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.1632 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.1068 Square kilometres per square kilometre Bhutan
2000s 0.1698 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.1212 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0487 Square kilometres per square kilometre Bhutan
2010s 0.152 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.1239 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0281 Square kilometres per square kilometre Bhutan
2020s 0.1479 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.1328 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0151 Square kilometres per square kilometre Bhutan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher land use hidden — other areas, per square kilometre, Bhutan or Zimbabwe?
Bhutan, at 0.1458 Square kilometres per square kilometre against 0.1347 Square kilometres per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in land use hidden — other areas, per square kilometre between Bhutan and Zimbabwe?
0.0111 Square kilometres per square kilometre, with Bhutan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Zimbabwe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Bhutan and Zimbabwe rank globally for land use hidden — other areas, per square kilometre?
Bhutan ranks 135th and Zimbabwe ranks 138th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Land use hidden — Other areas, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bhutan vs Zimbabwe: Land use hidden — Other areas, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 01 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-other-areas-per-square-kilometre/bhutan/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-other-areas-per-square-kilometre/bhutan/zimbabwe/">Bhutan vs Zimbabwe: Land use hidden — Other areas, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Land use hidden — Other areas, per square kilometre
Unit
Square kilometres per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 10,717 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Land use hidden — Other areas divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.