Botswana vs Ecuador: Land use hidden — Other areas, per square kilometre

Botswana
0.2808 Square kilometres per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador
0.2891 Square kilometres per square kilometre
in 2023
Botswana rank
80th
Ecuador rank
77th

Land use hidden — Other areas, per square kilometre over time

  • Botswana
  • Ecuador
0.20.40.60.8196119922023

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 0.2891 Square kilometres per square kilometre against 0.2808 Square kilometres per square kilometre in Botswana, a difference of 0.0083 Square kilometres per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Ecuador ahead.

Botswana ranks 80th and Ecuador ranks 77th of 181 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 3 and Ecuador in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Ecuador Difference Ahead
1960s 0.5412 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.8291 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.2878 Square kilometres per square kilometre Ecuador
1970s 0.5412 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.8052 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.264 Square kilometres per square kilometre Ecuador
1980s 0.5411 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.7372 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.1961 Square kilometres per square kilometre Ecuador
1990s 0.2203 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.1789 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0414 Square kilometres per square kilometre Botswana
2000s 0.2425 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.1561 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0864 Square kilometres per square kilometre Botswana
2010s 0.2626 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.2302 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0324 Square kilometres per square kilometre Botswana
2020s 0.2776 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.2834 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0057 Square kilometres per square kilometre Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher land use hidden — other areas, per square kilometre, Botswana or Ecuador?
Ecuador, at 0.2891 Square kilometres per square kilometre against 0.2808 Square kilometres per square kilometre in Botswana as of 2023.
What is the difference in land use hidden — other areas, per square kilometre between Botswana and Ecuador?
0.0083 Square kilometres per square kilometre, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Ecuador?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Botswana and Ecuador rank globally for land use hidden — other areas, per square kilometre?
Botswana ranks 80th and Ecuador ranks 77th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Land use hidden — Other areas, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Ecuador: Land use hidden — Other areas, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 01 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-other-areas-per-square-kilometre/botswana/ecuador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-other-areas-per-square-kilometre/botswana/ecuador/">Botswana vs Ecuador: Land use hidden — Other areas, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Land use hidden — Other areas, per square kilometre
Unit
Square kilometres per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 10,717 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Land use hidden — Other areas divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.