Brazil vs Malawi: Land use hidden — Other areas, per square kilometre

Brazil
0.1269 Square kilometres per square kilometre
in 2023
Malawi
0.1339 Square kilometres per square kilometre
in 2023
Brazil rank
141st
Malawi rank
139th

Land use hidden — Other areas, per square kilometre over time

  • Brazil
  • Malawi
00.20.40.60.8196119922023

How they compare

Malawi currently reports 0.1339 Square kilometres per square kilometre against 0.1269 Square kilometres per square kilometre in Brazil, a difference of 0.007 Square kilometres per square kilometre.

That makes Malawi's figure about 1.1 times Brazil's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Brazil ahead.

Brazil ranks 141st and Malawi ranks 139th of 181 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 3 and Malawi in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Malawi Difference Ahead
1960s 0.7945 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.6279 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.1666 Square kilometres per square kilometre Brazil
1970s 0.7517 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.5857 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.166 Square kilometres per square kilometre Brazil
1980s 0.7156 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.5734 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.1422 Square kilometres per square kilometre Brazil
1990s 0.0406 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.1873 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.1467 Square kilometres per square kilometre Malawi
2000s 0.0877 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.152 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0643 Square kilometres per square kilometre Malawi
2010s 0.1154 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.1359 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0206 Square kilometres per square kilometre Malawi
2020s 0.1247 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.129 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0042 Square kilometres per square kilometre Malawi

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher land use hidden — other areas, per square kilometre, Brazil or Malawi?
Malawi, at 0.1339 Square kilometres per square kilometre against 0.1269 Square kilometres per square kilometre in Brazil as of 2023.
What is the difference in land use hidden — other areas, per square kilometre between Brazil and Malawi?
0.007 Square kilometres per square kilometre, with Malawi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Malawi?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Brazil and Malawi rank globally for land use hidden — other areas, per square kilometre?
Brazil ranks 141st and Malawi ranks 139th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Land use hidden — Other areas, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs Malawi: Land use hidden — Other areas, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 01 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-other-areas-per-square-kilometre/brazil/malawi/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-other-areas-per-square-kilometre/brazil/malawi/">Brazil vs Malawi: Land use hidden — Other areas, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Land use hidden — Other areas, per square kilometre
Unit
Square kilometres per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 10,717 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Land use hidden — Other areas divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.