Brazil vs Zimbabwe: Land use hidden — Other areas, per square kilometre

Brazil
0.1269 Square kilometres per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0.1347 Square kilometres per square kilometre
in 2023
Brazil rank
141st
Zimbabwe rank
138th

Land use hidden — Other areas, per square kilometre over time

  • Brazil
  • Zimbabwe
00.20.40.60.8196119922023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 0.1347 Square kilometres per square kilometre against 0.1269 Square kilometres per square kilometre in Brazil, a difference of 0.0078 Square kilometres per square kilometre.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Brazil's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Brazil ahead.

Brazil ranks 141st and Zimbabwe ranks 138th of 181 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 3 and Zimbabwe in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 0.7945 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.7339 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0606 Square kilometres per square kilometre Brazil
1970s 0.7517 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.7102 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0415 Square kilometres per square kilometre Brazil
1980s 0.7156 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.6814 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0342 Square kilometres per square kilometre Brazil
1990s 0.0406 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.1632 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.1226 Square kilometres per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s 0.0877 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.1212 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0334 Square kilometres per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2010s 0.1154 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.1239 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0086 Square kilometres per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2020s 0.1247 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.1328 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0081 Square kilometres per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher land use hidden — other areas, per square kilometre, Brazil or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 0.1347 Square kilometres per square kilometre against 0.1269 Square kilometres per square kilometre in Brazil as of 2023.
What is the difference in land use hidden — other areas, per square kilometre between Brazil and Zimbabwe?
0.0078 Square kilometres per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Zimbabwe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Brazil and Zimbabwe rank globally for land use hidden — other areas, per square kilometre?
Brazil ranks 141st and Zimbabwe ranks 138th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Land use hidden — Other areas, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs Zimbabwe: Land use hidden — Other areas, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 01 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-other-areas-per-square-kilometre/brazil/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-other-areas-per-square-kilometre/brazil/zimbabwe/">Brazil vs Zimbabwe: Land use hidden — Other areas, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Land use hidden — Other areas, per square kilometre
Unit
Square kilometres per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 10,717 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Land use hidden — Other areas divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.