China vs Mongolia: Land use hidden — Other areas, per square kilometre

China
0.2084 Square kilometres per square kilometre
in 2023
Mongolia
0.2195 Square kilometres per square kilometre
in 2023
China rank
105th
Mongolia rank
102nd

Land use hidden — Other areas, per square kilometre over time

  • China
  • Mongolia
00.20.40.6196119922023

How they compare

Mongolia currently reports 0.2195 Square kilometres per square kilometre against 0.2084 Square kilometres per square kilometre in China, a difference of 0.0111 Square kilometres per square kilometre.

That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.1 times China's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was China ahead.

China ranks 105th and Mongolia ranks 102nd of 181 countries.

China has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Mongolia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.6246 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0909 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.5338 Square kilometres per square kilometre China
1970s 0.5785 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.13 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.4485 Square kilometres per square kilometre China
1980s 0.5066 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.1935 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.313 Square kilometres per square kilometre China
1990s 0.2736 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.1073 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.1662 Square kilometres per square kilometre China
2000s 0.2433 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.1415 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.1018 Square kilometres per square kilometre China
2010s 0.2218 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.1785 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0432 Square kilometres per square kilometre China
2020s 0.2114 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.1959 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0155 Square kilometres per square kilometre China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher land use hidden — other areas, per square kilometre, China or Mongolia?
Mongolia, at 0.2195 Square kilometres per square kilometre against 0.2084 Square kilometres per square kilometre in China as of 2023.
What is the difference in land use hidden — other areas, per square kilometre between China and Mongolia?
0.0111 Square kilometres per square kilometre, with Mongolia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Mongolia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do China and Mongolia rank globally for land use hidden — other areas, per square kilometre?
China ranks 105th and Mongolia ranks 102nd of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Land use hidden — Other areas, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Mongolia: Land use hidden — Other areas, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 01 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-other-areas-per-square-kilometre/china/mongolia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-other-areas-per-square-kilometre/china/mongolia/">China vs Mongolia: Land use hidden — Other areas, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Land use hidden — Other areas, per square kilometre
Unit
Square kilometres per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 10,717 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Land use hidden — Other areas divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.