Comoros vs Rwanda: Land use hidden — Other areas, per square kilometre

Comoros
0.1155 Square kilometres per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda
0.1236 Square kilometres per square kilometre
in 2023
Comoros rank
145th
Rwanda rank
142nd

Land use hidden — Other areas, per square kilometre over time

  • Comoros
  • Rwanda
0.10.20.30.40.5196119922023

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 0.1236 Square kilometres per square kilometre against 0.1155 Square kilometres per square kilometre in Comoros, a difference of 0.0081 Square kilometres per square kilometre.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.1 times Comoros's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Comoros ahead.

Comoros ranks 145th and Rwanda ranks 142nd of 181 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Comoros averaged higher in 5 and Rwanda in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Comoros Rwanda Difference Ahead
1960s 0.4895 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.4507 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0388 Square kilometres per square kilometre Comoros
1970s 0.4841 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.3619 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.1223 Square kilometres per square kilometre Comoros
1980s 0.4245 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.2685 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.156 Square kilometres per square kilometre Comoros
1990s 0.1145 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.1845 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.07 Square kilometres per square kilometre Rwanda
2000s 0.0779 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.1253 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0474 Square kilometres per square kilometre Rwanda
2010s 0.0955 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0929 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0026 Square kilometres per square kilometre Comoros
2020s 0.112 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.095 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.017 Square kilometres per square kilometre Comoros

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher land use hidden — other areas, per square kilometre, Comoros or Rwanda?
Rwanda, at 0.1236 Square kilometres per square kilometre against 0.1155 Square kilometres per square kilometre in Comoros as of 2023.
What is the difference in land use hidden — other areas, per square kilometre between Comoros and Rwanda?
0.0081 Square kilometres per square kilometre, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and Rwanda?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Comoros and Rwanda rank globally for land use hidden — other areas, per square kilometre?
Comoros ranks 145th and Rwanda ranks 142nd of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Land use hidden — Other areas, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Comoros vs Rwanda: Land use hidden — Other areas, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 01 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-other-areas-per-square-kilometre/comoros/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-other-areas-per-square-kilometre/comoros/rwanda/">Comoros vs Rwanda: Land use hidden — Other areas, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Land use hidden — Other areas, per square kilometre
Unit
Square kilometres per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 10,717 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Land use hidden — Other areas divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.