Costa Rica vs Tuvalu: Land use hidden — Other areas, per square kilometre

Costa Rica
0.0646 Square kilometres per square kilometre
in 2023
Tuvalu
0.0667 Square kilometres per square kilometre
in 2023
Costa Rica rank
164th
Tuvalu rank
162nd

Land use hidden — Other areas, per square kilometre over time

  • Costa Rica
  • Tuvalu
00.20.40.60.8196119922023

How they compare

Tuvalu currently reports 0.0667 Square kilometres per square kilometre against 0.0646 Square kilometres per square kilometre in Costa Rica, a difference of 0.0021 Square kilometres per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Costa Rica ahead.

Costa Rica ranks 164th and Tuvalu ranks 162nd of 181 countries.

Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica Tuvalu Difference Ahead
1960s 0.6944 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.3333 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.3611 Square kilometres per square kilometre Costa Rica
1970s 0.5859 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.3333 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.2526 Square kilometres per square kilometre Costa Rica
1980s 0.4928 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.3333 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.1595 Square kilometres per square kilometre Costa Rica
1990s 0.0322 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0322 Square kilometres per square kilometre Costa Rica
2000s 0.0832 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.08 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0032 Square kilometres per square kilometre Costa Rica
2010s 0.0765 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0667 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0099 Square kilometres per square kilometre Costa Rica
2020s 0.0679 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0667 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0012 Square kilometres per square kilometre Costa Rica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher land use hidden — other areas, per square kilometre, Costa Rica or Tuvalu?
Tuvalu, at 0.0667 Square kilometres per square kilometre against 0.0646 Square kilometres per square kilometre in Costa Rica as of 2023.
What is the difference in land use hidden — other areas, per square kilometre between Costa Rica and Tuvalu?
0.0021 Square kilometres per square kilometre, with Tuvalu ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Tuvalu?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Costa Rica and Tuvalu rank globally for land use hidden — other areas, per square kilometre?
Costa Rica ranks 164th and Tuvalu ranks 162nd of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Land use hidden — Other areas, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Costa Rica vs Tuvalu: Land use hidden — Other areas, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 01 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-other-areas-per-square-kilometre/costa-rica/tuvalu/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-other-areas-per-square-kilometre/costa-rica/tuvalu/">Costa Rica vs Tuvalu: Land use hidden — Other areas, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Land use hidden — Other areas, per square kilometre
Unit
Square kilometres per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 10,717 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Land use hidden — Other areas divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.