Cyprus vs Norway: Land use hidden — Other areas, per square kilometre

Cyprus
0.6737 Square kilometres per square kilometre
in 2023
Norway
0.638 Square kilometres per square kilometre
in 2023
Cyprus rank
26th
Norway rank
28th

Land use hidden — Other areas, per square kilometre over time

  • Cyprus
  • Norway
00.20.40.60.81196119922023

How they compare

Cyprus currently reports 0.6737 Square kilometres per square kilometre against 0.638 Square kilometres per square kilometre in Norway, a difference of 0.0357 Square kilometres per square kilometre.

That makes Cyprus's figure about 1.1 times Norway's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Norway ahead.

Cyprus ranks 26th and Norway ranks 28th of 181 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Cyprus averaged higher in 4 and Norway in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cyprus Norway Difference Ahead
1960s 0.5651 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.9723 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.4072 Square kilometres per square kilometre Norway
1970s 0.7023 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.975 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.2726 Square kilometres per square kilometre Norway
1980s 0.8154 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.9738 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.1584 Square kilometres per square kilometre Norway
1990s 0.6584 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.6396 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0188 Square kilometres per square kilometre Cyprus
2000s 0.6572 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.6401 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0171 Square kilometres per square kilometre Cyprus
2010s 0.6853 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.6405 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0448 Square kilometres per square kilometre Cyprus
2020s 0.6777 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.6383 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0394 Square kilometres per square kilometre Cyprus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher land use hidden — other areas, per square kilometre, Cyprus or Norway?
Cyprus, at 0.6737 Square kilometres per square kilometre against 0.638 Square kilometres per square kilometre in Norway as of 2023.
What is the difference in land use hidden — other areas, per square kilometre between Cyprus and Norway?
0.0357 Square kilometres per square kilometre, with Cyprus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cyprus and Norway?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Cyprus and Norway rank globally for land use hidden — other areas, per square kilometre?
Cyprus ranks 26th and Norway ranks 28th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Land use hidden — Other areas, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cyprus vs Norway: Land use hidden — Other areas, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 01 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-other-areas-per-square-kilometre/cyprus/norway/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-other-areas-per-square-kilometre/cyprus/norway/">Cyprus vs Norway: Land use hidden — Other areas, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Land use hidden — Other areas, per square kilometre
Unit
Square kilometres per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 10,717 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Land use hidden — Other areas divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.