Egypt vs Greenland: Land use hidden — Other areas, per square kilometre

Egypt
0.9588 Square kilometres per square kilometre
in 2023
Greenland
0.9941 Square kilometres per square kilometre
in 2023
Egypt rank
6th
Greenland rank
4th

Land use hidden — Other areas, per square kilometre over time

  • Egypt
  • Greenland
00.20.40.60.81196119922023

How they compare

Greenland currently reports 0.9941 Square kilometres per square kilometre against 0.9588 Square kilometres per square kilometre in Egypt, a difference of 0.0353 Square kilometres per square kilometre.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Greenland has been ahead every year.

Egypt ranks 6th and Greenland ranks 4th of 181 countries.

Greenland has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Egypt Greenland Difference Ahead
1960s 0.9733 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.9931 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0199 Square kilometres per square kilometre Greenland
1970s 0.9724 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.9931 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0207 Square kilometres per square kilometre Greenland
1980s 0.9749 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.9931 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0182 Square kilometres per square kilometre Greenland
1990s 0.9686 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.9934 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0248 Square kilometres per square kilometre Greenland
2000s 0.9645 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.9941 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0297 Square kilometres per square kilometre Greenland
2010s 0.9617 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.9941 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0323 Square kilometres per square kilometre Greenland
2020s 0.9591 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.9941 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.035 Square kilometres per square kilometre Greenland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher land use hidden — other areas, per square kilometre, Egypt or Greenland?
Greenland, at 0.9941 Square kilometres per square kilometre against 0.9588 Square kilometres per square kilometre in Egypt as of 2023.
What is the difference in land use hidden — other areas, per square kilometre between Egypt and Greenland?
0.0353 Square kilometres per square kilometre, with Greenland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Greenland?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Egypt and Greenland rank globally for land use hidden — other areas, per square kilometre?
Egypt ranks 6th and Greenland ranks 4th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Land use hidden — Other areas, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Egypt vs Greenland: Land use hidden — Other areas, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 01 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-other-areas-per-square-kilometre/egypt-arab-rep/greenland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-other-areas-per-square-kilometre/egypt-arab-rep/greenland/">Egypt vs Greenland: Land use hidden — Other areas, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Land use hidden — Other areas, per square kilometre
Unit
Square kilometres per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 10,717 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Land use hidden — Other areas divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.