Egypt vs Hong Kong: Land use hidden — Other areas, per square kilometre

Egypt
0.9588 Square kilometres per square kilometre
in 2023
Hong Kong
0.9619 Square kilometres per square kilometre
in 2023
Egypt rank
6th
Hong Kong rank
5th

Land use hidden — Other areas, per square kilometre over time

  • Egypt
  • Hong Kong
00.20.40.60.81196119922023

How they compare

Hong Kong currently reports 0.9619 Square kilometres per square kilometre against 0.9588 Square kilometres per square kilometre in Egypt, a difference of 0.0031 Square kilometres per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Egypt ahead.

Egypt ranks 6th and Hong Kong ranks 5th of 181 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Egypt averaged higher in 6 and Hong Kong in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Egypt Hong Kong Difference Ahead
1960s 0.9733 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.8693 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.104 Square kilometres per square kilometre Egypt
1970s 0.9724 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.8954 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0771 Square kilometres per square kilometre Egypt
1980s 0.9749 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.9103 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0646 Square kilometres per square kilometre Egypt
1990s 0.9686 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.9244 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0442 Square kilometres per square kilometre Egypt
2000s 0.9645 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.9371 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0273 Square kilometres per square kilometre Egypt
2010s 0.9617 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.951 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0108 Square kilometres per square kilometre Egypt
2020s 0.9591 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.9619 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0028 Square kilometres per square kilometre Hong Kong

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher land use hidden — other areas, per square kilometre, Egypt or Hong Kong?
Hong Kong, at 0.9619 Square kilometres per square kilometre against 0.9588 Square kilometres per square kilometre in Egypt as of 2023.
What is the difference in land use hidden — other areas, per square kilometre between Egypt and Hong Kong?
0.0031 Square kilometres per square kilometre, with Hong Kong ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Hong Kong?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Egypt and Hong Kong rank globally for land use hidden — other areas, per square kilometre?
Egypt ranks 6th and Hong Kong ranks 5th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Land use hidden — Other areas, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Egypt vs Hong Kong: Land use hidden — Other areas, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 01 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-other-areas-per-square-kilometre/egypt-arab-rep/hong-kong-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-other-areas-per-square-kilometre/egypt-arab-rep/hong-kong-sar-china/">Egypt vs Hong Kong: Land use hidden — Other areas, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Land use hidden — Other areas, per square kilometre
Unit
Square kilometres per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 10,717 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Land use hidden — Other areas divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.