El Salvador vs Gambia: Land use hidden — Other areas, per square kilometre

El Salvador
0.1476 Square kilometres per square kilometre
in 2023
Gambia
0.1507 Square kilometres per square kilometre
in 2023
El Salvador rank
133rd
Gambia rank
131st

Land use hidden — Other areas, per square kilometre over time

  • El Salvador
  • Gambia
00.10.20.30.40.5196119922023

How they compare

Gambia currently reports 0.1507 Square kilometres per square kilometre against 0.1476 Square kilometres per square kilometre in El Salvador, a difference of 0.0031 Square kilometres per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Gambia ahead.

El Salvador ranks 133rd and Gambia ranks 131st of 181 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 2 and Gambia in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade El Salvador Gambia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.4101 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.478 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0679 Square kilometres per square kilometre Gambia
1970s 0.4063 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.4472 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.041 Square kilometres per square kilometre Gambia
1980s 0.3944 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.4241 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0298 Square kilometres per square kilometre Gambia
1990s 0.0456 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0603 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0147 Square kilometres per square kilometre Gambia
2000s 0.0807 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.1689 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0882 Square kilometres per square kilometre Gambia
2010s 0.1201 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0956 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0245 Square kilometres per square kilometre El Salvador
2020s 0.1444 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.1422 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0022 Square kilometres per square kilometre El Salvador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher land use hidden — other areas, per square kilometre, El Salvador or Gambia?
Gambia, at 0.1507 Square kilometres per square kilometre against 0.1476 Square kilometres per square kilometre in El Salvador as of 2023.
What is the difference in land use hidden — other areas, per square kilometre between El Salvador and Gambia?
0.0031 Square kilometres per square kilometre, with Gambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Gambia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do El Salvador and Gambia rank globally for land use hidden — other areas, per square kilometre?
El Salvador ranks 133rd and Gambia ranks 131st of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Land use hidden — Other areas, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

El Salvador vs Gambia: Land use hidden — Other areas, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 01 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-other-areas-per-square-kilometre/el-salvador/gambia-the/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-other-areas-per-square-kilometre/el-salvador/gambia-the/">El Salvador vs Gambia: Land use hidden — Other areas, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Land use hidden — Other areas, per square kilometre
Unit
Square kilometres per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 10,717 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Land use hidden — Other areas divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.