Gibraltar vs Greenland: Land use hidden — Other areas, per square kilometre

Gibraltar
1 Square kilometres per square kilometre
in 2023
Greenland
0.9941 Square kilometres per square kilometre
in 2023
Gibraltar rank
1st
Greenland rank
4th

Land use hidden — Other areas, per square kilometre over time

  • Gibraltar
  • Greenland
00.20.40.60.81196119922023

How they compare

Gibraltar currently reports 1 Square kilometres per square kilometre against 0.9941 Square kilometres per square kilometre in Greenland, a difference of 0.0059 Square kilometres per square kilometre.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Gibraltar has been ahead every year.

Gibraltar ranks 1st and Greenland ranks 4th of 181 countries.

Gibraltar has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Gibraltar Greenland Difference Ahead
1960s 1 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.9931 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0069 Square kilometres per square kilometre Gibraltar
1970s 1 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.9931 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0069 Square kilometres per square kilometre Gibraltar
1980s 1 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.9931 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0069 Square kilometres per square kilometre Gibraltar
1990s 1 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.9934 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0066 Square kilometres per square kilometre Gibraltar
2000s 1 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.9941 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0059 Square kilometres per square kilometre Gibraltar
2010s 1 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.9941 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0059 Square kilometres per square kilometre Gibraltar
2020s 1 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.9941 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0059 Square kilometres per square kilometre Gibraltar

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher land use hidden — other areas, per square kilometre, Gibraltar or Greenland?
Gibraltar, at 1 Square kilometres per square kilometre against 0.9941 Square kilometres per square kilometre in Greenland as of 2023.
What is the difference in land use hidden — other areas, per square kilometre between Gibraltar and Greenland?
0.0059 Square kilometres per square kilometre, with Gibraltar ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Gibraltar and Greenland?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Gibraltar and Greenland rank globally for land use hidden — other areas, per square kilometre?
Gibraltar ranks 1st and Greenland ranks 4th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Land use hidden — Other areas, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Gibraltar vs Greenland: Land use hidden — Other areas, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 01 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-other-areas-per-square-kilometre/gibraltar/greenland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-other-areas-per-square-kilometre/gibraltar/greenland/">Gibraltar vs Greenland: Land use hidden — Other areas, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Land use hidden — Other areas, per square kilometre
Unit
Square kilometres per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 10,717 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Land use hidden — Other areas divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.