Greenland vs Hong Kong: Land use hidden — Other areas, per square kilometre

Greenland
0.9941 Square kilometres per square kilometre
in 2023
Hong Kong
0.9619 Square kilometres per square kilometre
in 2023
Greenland rank
4th
Hong Kong rank
5th

Land use hidden — Other areas, per square kilometre over time

  • Greenland
  • Hong Kong
00.20.40.60.81196119922023

How they compare

Greenland currently reports 0.9941 Square kilometres per square kilometre against 0.9619 Square kilometres per square kilometre in Hong Kong, a difference of 0.0322 Square kilometres per square kilometre.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Greenland has been ahead every year.

Greenland ranks 4th and Hong Kong ranks 5th of 181 countries.

Greenland has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Greenland Hong Kong Difference Ahead
1960s 0.9931 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.8693 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.1238 Square kilometres per square kilometre Greenland
1970s 0.9931 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.8954 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0977 Square kilometres per square kilometre Greenland
1980s 0.9931 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.9103 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0828 Square kilometres per square kilometre Greenland
1990s 0.9934 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.9244 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.069 Square kilometres per square kilometre Greenland
2000s 0.9941 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.9371 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.057 Square kilometres per square kilometre Greenland
2010s 0.9941 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.951 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0431 Square kilometres per square kilometre Greenland
2020s 0.9941 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.9619 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0322 Square kilometres per square kilometre Greenland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher land use hidden — other areas, per square kilometre, Greenland or Hong Kong?
Greenland, at 0.9941 Square kilometres per square kilometre against 0.9619 Square kilometres per square kilometre in Hong Kong as of 2023.
What is the difference in land use hidden — other areas, per square kilometre between Greenland and Hong Kong?
0.0322 Square kilometres per square kilometre, with Greenland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Greenland and Hong Kong?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Greenland and Hong Kong rank globally for land use hidden — other areas, per square kilometre?
Greenland ranks 4th and Hong Kong ranks 5th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Land use hidden — Other areas, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Greenland vs Hong Kong: Land use hidden — Other areas, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 01 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-other-areas-per-square-kilometre/greenland/hong-kong-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-other-areas-per-square-kilometre/greenland/hong-kong-sar-china/">Greenland vs Hong Kong: Land use hidden — Other areas, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Land use hidden — Other areas, per square kilometre
Unit
Square kilometres per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 10,717 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Land use hidden — Other areas divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.