Jamaica vs Tanzania: Land use hidden — Other areas, per square kilometre

Jamaica
0.0531 Square kilometres per square kilometre
in 2023
Tanzania
0.0533 Square kilometres per square kilometre
in 2023
Jamaica rank
167th
Tanzania rank
166th

Land use hidden — Other areas, per square kilometre over time

  • Jamaica
  • Tanzania
00.20.40.60.8196119922023

How they compare

Tanzania currently reports 0.0533 Square kilometres per square kilometre against 0.0531 Square kilometres per square kilometre in Jamaica, a difference of 0.0002 Square kilometres per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Tanzania ahead.

Jamaica ranks 167th and Tanzania ranks 166th of 181 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Jamaica averaged higher in 4 and Tanzania in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Jamaica Tanzania Difference Ahead
1960s 0.5167 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.6977 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.181 Square kilometres per square kilometre Tanzania
1970s 0.5328 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.6715 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.1387 Square kilometres per square kilometre Tanzania
1980s 0.5549 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.6455 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0906 Square kilometres per square kilometre Tanzania
1990s 0.0685 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0012 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0672 Square kilometres per square kilometre Jamaica
2000s 0.0721 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0144 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0577 Square kilometres per square kilometre Jamaica
2010s 0.0822 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0235 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0587 Square kilometres per square kilometre Jamaica
2020s 0.0584 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0454 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0131 Square kilometres per square kilometre Jamaica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher land use hidden — other areas, per square kilometre, Jamaica or Tanzania?
Tanzania, at 0.0533 Square kilometres per square kilometre against 0.0531 Square kilometres per square kilometre in Jamaica as of 2023.
What is the difference in land use hidden — other areas, per square kilometre between Jamaica and Tanzania?
0.0002 Square kilometres per square kilometre, with Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and Tanzania?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Jamaica and Tanzania rank globally for land use hidden — other areas, per square kilometre?
Jamaica ranks 167th and Tanzania ranks 166th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Land use hidden — Other areas, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Jamaica vs Tanzania: Land use hidden — Other areas, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 01 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-other-areas-per-square-kilometre/jamaica/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-other-areas-per-square-kilometre/jamaica/tanzania/">Jamaica vs Tanzania: Land use hidden — Other areas, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Land use hidden — Other areas, per square kilometre
Unit
Square kilometres per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 10,717 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Land use hidden — Other areas divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.