Kenya vs San Marino: Land use hidden — Other areas, per square kilometre

Kenya
0.4426 Square kilometres per square kilometre
in 2023
San Marino
0.45 Square kilometres per square kilometre
in 2023
Kenya rank
49th
San Marino rank
48th

Land use hidden — Other areas, per square kilometre over time

  • Kenya
  • San Marino
00.20.40.60.8196119922023

How they compare

San Marino currently reports 0.45 Square kilometres per square kilometre against 0.4426 Square kilometres per square kilometre in Kenya, a difference of 0.0074 Square kilometres per square kilometre.

Across all 63 years both countries report, San Marino has been ahead every year.

Kenya ranks 49th and San Marino ranks 48th of 181 countries.

San Marino has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kenya San Marino Difference Ahead
1960s 0.5597 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.8333 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.2736 Square kilometres per square kilometre San Marino
1970s 0.555 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.8333 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.2783 Square kilometres per square kilometre San Marino
1980s 0.5431 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.8333 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.2902 Square kilometres per square kilometre San Marino
1990s 0.4596 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.6667 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.2071 Square kilometres per square kilometre San Marino
2000s 0.4591 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.6667 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.2075 Square kilometres per square kilometre San Marino
2010s 0.4438 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.5583 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.1145 Square kilometres per square kilometre San Marino
2020s 0.4433 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.45 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0067 Square kilometres per square kilometre San Marino

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher land use hidden — other areas, per square kilometre, Kenya or San Marino?
San Marino, at 0.45 Square kilometres per square kilometre against 0.4426 Square kilometres per square kilometre in Kenya as of 2023.
What is the difference in land use hidden — other areas, per square kilometre between Kenya and San Marino?
0.0074 Square kilometres per square kilometre, with San Marino ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kenya and San Marino?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Kenya and San Marino rank globally for land use hidden — other areas, per square kilometre?
Kenya ranks 49th and San Marino ranks 48th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Land use hidden — Other areas, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kenya vs San Marino: Land use hidden — Other areas, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 01 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-other-areas-per-square-kilometre/kenya/san-marino/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-other-areas-per-square-kilometre/kenya/san-marino/">Kenya vs San Marino: Land use hidden — Other areas, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Land use hidden — Other areas, per square kilometre
Unit
Square kilometres per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 10,717 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Land use hidden — Other areas divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.