Malawi vs Rwanda: Land use hidden — Other areas, per square kilometre

Malawi
0.1339 Square kilometres per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda
0.1236 Square kilometres per square kilometre
in 2023
Malawi rank
139th
Rwanda rank
142nd

Land use hidden — Other areas, per square kilometre over time

  • Malawi
  • Rwanda
00.20.40.6196119922023

How they compare

Malawi currently reports 0.1339 Square kilometres per square kilometre against 0.1236 Square kilometres per square kilometre in Rwanda, a difference of 0.0103 Square kilometres per square kilometre.

That makes Malawi's figure about 1.1 times Rwanda's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Malawi ahead.

Malawi ranks 139th and Rwanda ranks 142nd of 181 countries.

Malawi has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malawi Rwanda Difference Ahead
1960s 0.6279 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.4507 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.1771 Square kilometres per square kilometre Malawi
1970s 0.5857 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.3619 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.2238 Square kilometres per square kilometre Malawi
1980s 0.5734 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.2685 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.3049 Square kilometres per square kilometre Malawi
1990s 0.1873 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.1845 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0027 Square kilometres per square kilometre Malawi
2000s 0.152 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.1253 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0268 Square kilometres per square kilometre Malawi
2010s 0.1359 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0929 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0431 Square kilometres per square kilometre Malawi
2020s 0.129 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.095 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.034 Square kilometres per square kilometre Malawi

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher land use hidden — other areas, per square kilometre, Malawi or Rwanda?
Malawi, at 0.1339 Square kilometres per square kilometre against 0.1236 Square kilometres per square kilometre in Rwanda as of 2023.
What is the difference in land use hidden — other areas, per square kilometre between Malawi and Rwanda?
0.0103 Square kilometres per square kilometre, with Malawi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Rwanda?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Malawi and Rwanda rank globally for land use hidden — other areas, per square kilometre?
Malawi ranks 139th and Rwanda ranks 142nd of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Land use hidden — Other areas, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malawi vs Rwanda: Land use hidden — Other areas, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 01 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-other-areas-per-square-kilometre/malawi/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-other-areas-per-square-kilometre/malawi/rwanda/">Malawi vs Rwanda: Land use hidden — Other areas, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Land use hidden — Other areas, per square kilometre
Unit
Square kilometres per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 10,717 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Land use hidden — Other areas divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.