Malawi vs Zimbabwe: Land use hidden — Other areas, per square kilometre

Malawi
0.1339 Square kilometres per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0.1347 Square kilometres per square kilometre
in 2023
Malawi rank
139th
Zimbabwe rank
138th

Land use hidden — Other areas, per square kilometre over time

  • Malawi
  • Zimbabwe
0.20.40.60.8196119922023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 0.1347 Square kilometres per square kilometre against 0.1339 Square kilometres per square kilometre in Malawi, a difference of 0.0008 Square kilometres per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Malawi ranks 139th and Zimbabwe ranks 138th of 181 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Malawi averaged higher in 3 and Zimbabwe in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malawi Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 0.6279 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.7339 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.106 Square kilometres per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1970s 0.5857 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.7102 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.1246 Square kilometres per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1980s 0.5734 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.6814 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.108 Square kilometres per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1990s 0.1873 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.1632 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0241 Square kilometres per square kilometre Malawi
2000s 0.152 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.1212 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0309 Square kilometres per square kilometre Malawi
2010s 0.1359 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.1239 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.012 Square kilometres per square kilometre Malawi
2020s 0.129 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.1328 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0039 Square kilometres per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher land use hidden — other areas, per square kilometre, Malawi or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 0.1347 Square kilometres per square kilometre against 0.1339 Square kilometres per square kilometre in Malawi as of 2023.
What is the difference in land use hidden — other areas, per square kilometre between Malawi and Zimbabwe?
0.0008 Square kilometres per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Zimbabwe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Malawi and Zimbabwe rank globally for land use hidden — other areas, per square kilometre?
Malawi ranks 139th and Zimbabwe ranks 138th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Land use hidden — Other areas, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malawi vs Zimbabwe: Land use hidden — Other areas, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 01 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-other-areas-per-square-kilometre/malawi/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-other-areas-per-square-kilometre/malawi/zimbabwe/">Malawi vs Zimbabwe: Land use hidden — Other areas, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Land use hidden — Other areas, per square kilometre
Unit
Square kilometres per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 10,717 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Land use hidden — Other areas divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.