Panama vs Zimbabwe: Land use hidden — Other areas, per square kilometre

Panama
0.1413 Square kilometres per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0.1347 Square kilometres per square kilometre
in 2023
Panama rank
136th
Zimbabwe rank
138th

Land use hidden — Other areas, per square kilometre over time

  • Panama
  • Zimbabwe
00.20.40.60.8196119922023

How they compare

Panama currently reports 0.1413 Square kilometres per square kilometre against 0.1347 Square kilometres per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.0066 Square kilometres per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Panama ahead.

Panama ranks 136th and Zimbabwe ranks 138th of 181 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Panama averaged higher in 4 and Zimbabwe in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Panama Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 0.7771 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.7339 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0433 Square kilometres per square kilometre Panama
1970s 0.7596 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.7102 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0493 Square kilometres per square kilometre Panama
1980s 0.7338 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.6814 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0524 Square kilometres per square kilometre Panama
1990s 0.1023 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.1632 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0608 Square kilometres per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s 0.1091 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.1212 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0121 Square kilometres per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2010s 0.1237 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.1239 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0002 Square kilometres per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2020s 0.1397 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.1328 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0069 Square kilometres per square kilometre Panama

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher land use hidden — other areas, per square kilometre, Panama or Zimbabwe?
Panama, at 0.1413 Square kilometres per square kilometre against 0.1347 Square kilometres per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in land use hidden — other areas, per square kilometre between Panama and Zimbabwe?
0.0066 Square kilometres per square kilometre, with Panama ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Panama and Zimbabwe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Panama and Zimbabwe rank globally for land use hidden — other areas, per square kilometre?
Panama ranks 136th and Zimbabwe ranks 138th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Land use hidden — Other areas, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Panama vs Zimbabwe: Land use hidden — Other areas, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 01 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-other-areas-per-square-kilometre/panama/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-other-areas-per-square-kilometre/panama/zimbabwe/">Panama vs Zimbabwe: Land use hidden — Other areas, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Land use hidden — Other areas, per square kilometre
Unit
Square kilometres per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 10,717 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Land use hidden — Other areas divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.