Central African Republic vs Greenland: Land use hidden — Other areas, per unit of GDP

Central African Republic
0.0001 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Greenland
0.0001 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Central African Republic rank
1st
Greenland rank
2nd

Land use hidden — Other areas, per unit of GDP over time

  • Central African Republic
  • Greenland
00.0010.0020.0030.0040.005196119922023

How they compare

Central African Republic currently reports 0.0001 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP against 0.0001 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP in Greenland, a difference of 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP.

That makes Central African Republic's figure about 1.1 times Greenland's.

The two have swapped places 15 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Greenland ahead.

Central African Republic ranks 1st and Greenland ranks 2nd of 178 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Central African Republic averaged higher in 4 and Greenland in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central African Republic Greenland Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0018 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP 0.0022 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP 0.0004 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP Greenland
1980s 0.0007 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP 0.0007 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP Central African Republic
1990s 0.0003 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP 0.0003 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP Greenland
2000s 0.0003 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP 0.0003 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP Central African Republic
2010s 0.0002 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP 0.0001 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP Central African Republic
2020s 0.0001 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP 0.0001 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP Central African Republic

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher land use hidden — other areas, per unit of gdp, Central African Republic or Greenland?
Central African Republic, at 0.0001 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP against 0.0001 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP in Greenland as of 2023.
What is the difference in land use hidden — other areas, per unit of gdp between Central African Republic and Greenland?
0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP, with Central African Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Greenland?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Central African Republic and Greenland rank globally for land use hidden — other areas, per unit of gdp?
Central African Republic ranks 1st and Greenland ranks 2nd of 178 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Land use hidden — Other areas, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central African Republic vs Greenland: Land use hidden — Other areas, per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-other-areas-per-unit-of-gdp/central-african-republic/greenland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-other-areas-per-unit-of-gdp/central-african-republic/greenland/">Central African Republic vs Greenland: Land use hidden — Other areas, per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Land use hidden — Other areas, per unit of GDP
Unit
Square kilometres per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
178 places, 9,530 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Land use hidden — Other areas divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.