Aruba vs Guinea-Bissau: Land use hidden — Other areas

Aruba
155.8 Square kilometres
in 2023
Guinea-Bissau
167.79 Square kilometres
in 2023
Aruba rank
170th
Guinea-Bissau rank
169th

Land use hidden — Other areas over time

  • Aruba
  • Guinea-Bissau
05.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k25.0k196119922023

How they compare

Guinea-Bissau currently reports 167.79 Square kilometres against 155.8 Square kilometres in Aruba, a difference of 11.99 Square kilometres.

That makes Guinea-Bissau's figure about 1.1 times Aruba's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Guinea-Bissau ahead.

Aruba ranks 170th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 169th of 202 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Aruba averaged higher in 4 and Guinea-Bissau in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Aruba Guinea-Bissau Difference Ahead
1960s 160 Square kilometres 23,190 Square kilometres 23,030 Square kilometres Guinea-Bissau
1970s 160 Square kilometres 23,054 Square kilometres 22,894 Square kilometres Guinea-Bissau
1980s 160 Square kilometres 22,664 Square kilometres 22,504 Square kilometres Guinea-Bissau
1990s 155.8 Square kilometres 19.33 Square kilometres 136.47 Square kilometres Aruba
2000s 155.8 Square kilometres 0.0004 Square kilometres 155.8 Square kilometres Aruba
2010s 155.8 Square kilometres 26.27 Square kilometres 129.53 Square kilometres Aruba
2020s 155.8 Square kilometres 101.95 Square kilometres 53.85 Square kilometres Aruba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher land use hidden — other areas, Aruba or Guinea-Bissau?
Guinea-Bissau, at 167.79 Square kilometres against 155.8 Square kilometres in Aruba as of 2023.
What is the difference in land use hidden — other areas between Aruba and Guinea-Bissau?
11.99 Square kilometres, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Guinea-Bissau?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Aruba and Guinea-Bissau rank globally for land use hidden — other areas?
Aruba ranks 170th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 169th of 202 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Land use hidden — Other areas. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Aruba vs Guinea-Bissau: Land use hidden — Other areas. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-other-areas/aruba/guinea-bissau/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-other-areas/aruba/guinea-bissau/">Aruba vs Guinea-Bissau: Land use hidden — Other areas</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Land use hidden — Other areas
Unit
Square kilometres
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
230 places, 13,416 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Land resources are one of the four components of the natural environment: water, air, land and living resources. In this context land is both: a physical "milieu" necessary for the development of natural vegetation as well as cultivated vegetation; a resource for human activities. The data presented here give information concerning land use state and changes (e.g. agricultural land, forest land). Data source(s): Food and Agriculture Organization of the U.N., (FAOSTAT) Contact: ENV.Stat@oecd.org Dataset release date: June 3, 2024 Database documentation Countries metadata