Antigua and Barbuda vs Guam: Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures, per capita

Antigua and Barbuda
0.0004 Square kilometres per person
in 2023
Guam
0.0005 Square kilometres per person
in 2023
Antigua and Barbuda rank
117th
Guam rank
115th

Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures, per capita over time

  • Antigua and Barbuda
  • Guam
00.0010.0010.0010.001196119922023

How they compare

Guam currently reports 0.0005 Square kilometres per person against 0.0004 Square kilometres per person in Antigua and Barbuda, a difference of 0.0001 Square kilometres per person.

That makes Guam's figure about 1.1 times Antigua and Barbuda's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Guam ahead.

Antigua and Barbuda ranks 117th and Guam ranks 115th of 167 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Antigua and Barbuda averaged higher in 2 and Guam in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Antigua and Barbuda Guam Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0004 Square kilometres per person 0.001 Square kilometres per person 0.0006 Square kilometres per person Guam
1970s 0.0005 Square kilometres per person 0.0008 Square kilometres per person 0.0004 Square kilometres per person Guam
1980s 0.0006 Square kilometres per person 0.0007 Square kilometres per person 0.0001 Square kilometres per person Guam
1990s 0.0006 Square kilometres per person 0.0005 Square kilometres per person 0.0001 Square kilometres per person Antigua and Barbuda
2000s 0.0005 Square kilometres per person 0.0005 Square kilometres per person 0 Square kilometres per person Antigua and Barbuda
2010s 0.0005 Square kilometres per person 0.0005 Square kilometres per person 0 Square kilometres per person Guam
2020s 0.0004 Square kilometres per person 0.0005 Square kilometres per person 0.0001 Square kilometres per person Guam

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher land use hidden — permanent meadows and pastures, per capita, Antigua and Barbuda or Guam?
Guam, at 0.0005 Square kilometres per person against 0.0004 Square kilometres per person in Antigua and Barbuda as of 2023.
What is the difference in land use hidden — permanent meadows and pastures, per capita between Antigua and Barbuda and Guam?
0.0001 Square kilometres per person, with Guam ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Guam?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Antigua and Barbuda and Guam rank globally for land use hidden — permanent meadows and pastures, per capita?
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 117th and Guam ranks 115th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Antigua and Barbuda vs Guam: Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures, per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-permanent-meadows-and-pastures-per-capita/antigua-and-barbuda/guam/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-permanent-meadows-and-pastures-per-capita/antigua-and-barbuda/guam/">Antigua and Barbuda vs Guam: Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures, per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures, per capita
Unit
Square kilometres per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
167 places, 9,813 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.