Cayman Islands vs Pakistan: Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures, per capita

Cayman Islands
0.0003 Square kilometres per person
in 2023
Pakistan
0.0002 Square kilometres per person
in 2023
Cayman Islands rank
132nd
Pakistan rank
135th

Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures, per capita over time

  • Cayman Islands
  • Pakistan
00.0010.0010.0020.0020.003196119922023

How they compare

Cayman Islands currently reports 0.0003 Square kilometres per person against 0.0002 Square kilometres per person in Pakistan, a difference of 0.0001 Square kilometres per person.

That makes Cayman Islands's figure about 1.4 times Pakistan's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Cayman Islands has been ahead every year.

Cayman Islands ranks 132nd and Pakistan ranks 135th of 167 countries.

Cayman Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cayman Islands Pakistan Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0021 Square kilometres per person 0.001 Square kilometres per person 0.0012 Square kilometres per person Cayman Islands
1970s 0.0015 Square kilometres per person 0.0007 Square kilometres per person 0.0008 Square kilometres per person Cayman Islands
1980s 0.001 Square kilometres per person 0.0005 Square kilometres per person 0.0004 Square kilometres per person Cayman Islands
1990s 0.0006 Square kilometres per person 0.0004 Square kilometres per person 0.0003 Square kilometres per person Cayman Islands
2000s 0.0004 Square kilometres per person 0.0003 Square kilometres per person 0.0001 Square kilometres per person Cayman Islands
2010s 0.0003 Square kilometres per person 0.0002 Square kilometres per person 0.0001 Square kilometres per person Cayman Islands
2020s 0.0003 Square kilometres per person 0.0002 Square kilometres per person 0.0001 Square kilometres per person Cayman Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher land use hidden — permanent meadows and pastures, per capita, Cayman Islands or Pakistan?
Cayman Islands, at 0.0003 Square kilometres per person against 0.0002 Square kilometres per person in Pakistan as of 2023.
What is the difference in land use hidden — permanent meadows and pastures, per capita between Cayman Islands and Pakistan?
0.0001 Square kilometres per person, with Cayman Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cayman Islands and Pakistan?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Cayman Islands and Pakistan rank globally for land use hidden — permanent meadows and pastures, per capita?
Cayman Islands ranks 132nd and Pakistan ranks 135th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cayman Islands vs Pakistan: Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures, per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-permanent-meadows-and-pastures-per-capita/cayman-islands/pakistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-permanent-meadows-and-pastures-per-capita/cayman-islands/pakistan/">Cayman Islands vs Pakistan: Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures, per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures, per capita
Unit
Square kilometres per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
167 places, 9,813 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.