Chile vs Georgia: Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures, per capita

Chile
0.0045 Square kilometres per person
in 2023
Georgia
0.0052 Square kilometres per person
in 2023
Chile rank
53rd
Georgia rank
50th

Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures, per capita over time

  • Chile
  • Georgia
0.0040.0060.0080.010.012196119922023

How they compare

Georgia currently reports 0.0052 Square kilometres per person against 0.0045 Square kilometres per person in Chile, a difference of 0.0007 Square kilometres per person.

That makes Georgia's figure about 1.2 times Chile's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Chile ahead.

Chile ranks 53rd and Georgia ranks 50th of 167 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 3 and Georgia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Georgia Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0088 Square kilometres per person 0.0044 Square kilometres per person 0.0045 Square kilometres per person Chile
2000s 0.0084 Square kilometres per person 0.0049 Square kilometres per person 0.0034 Square kilometres per person Chile
2010s 0.0062 Square kilometres per person 0.0052 Square kilometres per person 0.001 Square kilometres per person Chile
2020s 0.0046 Square kilometres per person 0.0052 Square kilometres per person 0.0007 Square kilometres per person Georgia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher land use hidden — permanent meadows and pastures, per capita, Chile or Georgia?
Georgia, at 0.0052 Square kilometres per person against 0.0045 Square kilometres per person in Chile as of 2023.
What is the difference in land use hidden — permanent meadows and pastures, per capita between Chile and Georgia?
0.0007 Square kilometres per person, with Georgia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Georgia?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Chile and Georgia rank globally for land use hidden — permanent meadows and pastures, per capita?
Chile ranks 53rd and Georgia ranks 50th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Georgia: Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures, per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-permanent-meadows-and-pastures-per-capita/chile/georgia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-permanent-meadows-and-pastures-per-capita/chile/georgia/">Chile vs Georgia: Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures, per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures, per capita
Unit
Square kilometres per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
167 places, 9,813 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.