Dominican Republic vs Guatemala: Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures, per capita

Dominican Republic
0.001 Square kilometres per person
in 2023
Guatemala
0.001 Square kilometres per person
in 2023
Dominican Republic rank
97th
Guatemala rank
96th

Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures, per capita over time

  • Dominican Republic
  • Guatemala
0.0010.0020.0030.004196119922023

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 0.001 Square kilometres per person against 0.001 Square kilometres per person in Dominican Republic, a difference of 0 Square kilometres per person.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Dominican Republic ahead.

Dominican Republic ranks 97th and Guatemala ranks 96th of 167 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Dominican Republic averaged higher in 2 and Guatemala in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Dominican Republic Guatemala Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0032 Square kilometres per person 0.0024 Square kilometres per person 0.0007 Square kilometres per person Dominican Republic
1970s 0.0024 Square kilometres per person 0.0021 Square kilometres per person 0.0004 Square kilometres per person Dominican Republic
1980s 0.0019 Square kilometres per person 0.0023 Square kilometres per person 0.0004 Square kilometres per person Guatemala
1990s 0.0015 Square kilometres per person 0.0025 Square kilometres per person 0.001 Square kilometres per person Guatemala
2000s 0.0013 Square kilometres per person 0.0017 Square kilometres per person 0.0004 Square kilometres per person Guatemala
2010s 0.0011 Square kilometres per person 0.0012 Square kilometres per person 0.0001 Square kilometres per person Guatemala
2020s 0.001 Square kilometres per person 0.0011 Square kilometres per person 0 Square kilometres per person Guatemala

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher land use hidden — permanent meadows and pastures, per capita, Dominican Republic or Guatemala?
Guatemala, at 0.001 Square kilometres per person against 0.001 Square kilometres per person in Dominican Republic as of 2023.
What is the difference in land use hidden — permanent meadows and pastures, per capita between Dominican Republic and Guatemala?
0 Square kilometres per person, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Guatemala?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Dominican Republic and Guatemala rank globally for land use hidden — permanent meadows and pastures, per capita?
Dominican Republic ranks 97th and Guatemala ranks 96th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Dominican Republic vs Guatemala: Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures, per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-permanent-meadows-and-pastures-per-capita/dominican-republic/guatemala/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-permanent-meadows-and-pastures-per-capita/dominican-republic/guatemala/">Dominican Republic vs Guatemala: Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures, per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures, per capita
Unit
Square kilometres per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
167 places, 9,813 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.