French Polynesia vs Mauritius: Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures, per capita

French Polynesia
0.0001 Square kilometres per person
in 2023
Mauritius
0.0001 Square kilometres per person
in 2023
French Polynesia rank
153rd
Mauritius rank
152nd

Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures, per capita over time

  • French Polynesia
  • Mauritius
00.0010.0010.0020.0020.003196119922023

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports 0.0001 Square kilometres per person against 0.0001 Square kilometres per person in French Polynesia, a difference of 0 Square kilometres per person.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was French Polynesia ahead.

French Polynesia ranks 153rd and Mauritius ranks 152nd of 167 countries.

French Polynesia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade French Polynesia Mauritius Difference Ahead
1960s 0.002 Square kilometres per person 0.0001 Square kilometres per person 0.0019 Square kilometres per person French Polynesia
1970s 0.0013 Square kilometres per person 0.0001 Square kilometres per person 0.0012 Square kilometres per person French Polynesia
1980s 0.0008 Square kilometres per person 0.0001 Square kilometres per person 0.0007 Square kilometres per person French Polynesia
1990s 0.0005 Square kilometres per person 0.0001 Square kilometres per person 0.0005 Square kilometres per person French Polynesia
2000s 0.0004 Square kilometres per person 0.0001 Square kilometres per person 0.0003 Square kilometres per person French Polynesia
2010s 0.0002 Square kilometres per person 0.0001 Square kilometres per person 0.0002 Square kilometres per person French Polynesia
2020s 0.0001 Square kilometres per person 0.0001 Square kilometres per person 0 Square kilometres per person French Polynesia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher land use hidden — permanent meadows and pastures, per capita, French Polynesia or Mauritius?
Mauritius, at 0.0001 Square kilometres per person against 0.0001 Square kilometres per person in French Polynesia as of 2023.
What is the difference in land use hidden — permanent meadows and pastures, per capita between French Polynesia and Mauritius?
0 Square kilometres per person, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for French Polynesia and Mauritius?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do French Polynesia and Mauritius rank globally for land use hidden — permanent meadows and pastures, per capita?
French Polynesia ranks 153rd and Mauritius ranks 152nd of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

French Polynesia vs Mauritius: Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures, per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-permanent-meadows-and-pastures-per-capita/french-polynesia/mauritius/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-permanent-meadows-and-pastures-per-capita/french-polynesia/mauritius/">French Polynesia vs Mauritius: Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures, per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures, per capita
Unit
Square kilometres per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
167 places, 9,813 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.