Guatemala vs Guinea-Bissau: Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures, per capita

Guatemala
0.001 Square kilometres per person
in 2023
Guinea-Bissau
0.0009 Square kilometres per person
in 2023
Guatemala rank
96th
Guinea-Bissau rank
98th

Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures, per capita over time

  • Guatemala
  • Guinea-Bissau
0.0010.0020.0030.004196119922023

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 0.001 Square kilometres per person against 0.0009 Square kilometres per person in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 0.0001 Square kilometres per person.

That makes Guatemala's figure about 1.1 times Guinea-Bissau's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Guinea-Bissau ahead.

Guatemala ranks 96th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 98th of 167 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 3 and Guinea-Bissau in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Guinea-Bissau Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0024 Square kilometres per person 0.0036 Square kilometres per person 0.0012 Square kilometres per person Guinea-Bissau
1970s 0.0021 Square kilometres per person 0.0032 Square kilometres per person 0.0012 Square kilometres per person Guinea-Bissau
1980s 0.0023 Square kilometres per person 0.0024 Square kilometres per person 0.0001 Square kilometres per person Guinea-Bissau
1990s 0.0025 Square kilometres per person 0.0019 Square kilometres per person 0.0007 Square kilometres per person Guatemala
2000s 0.0017 Square kilometres per person 0.0012 Square kilometres per person 0.0005 Square kilometres per person Guatemala
2010s 0.0012 Square kilometres per person 0.0013 Square kilometres per person 0.0001 Square kilometres per person Guinea-Bissau
2020s 0.0011 Square kilometres per person 0.0009 Square kilometres per person 0.0001 Square kilometres per person Guatemala

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher land use hidden — permanent meadows and pastures, per capita, Guatemala or Guinea-Bissau?
Guatemala, at 0.001 Square kilometres per person against 0.0009 Square kilometres per person in Guinea-Bissau as of 2023.
What is the difference in land use hidden — permanent meadows and pastures, per capita between Guatemala and Guinea-Bissau?
0.0001 Square kilometres per person, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Guinea-Bissau?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Guatemala and Guinea-Bissau rank globally for land use hidden — permanent meadows and pastures, per capita?
Guatemala ranks 96th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 98th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs Guinea-Bissau: Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures, per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-permanent-meadows-and-pastures-per-capita/guatemala/guinea-bissau/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-permanent-meadows-and-pastures-per-capita/guatemala/guinea-bissau/">Guatemala vs Guinea-Bissau: Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures, per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures, per capita
Unit
Square kilometres per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
167 places, 9,813 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.