Israel vs Papua New Guinea: Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures, per capita

Israel
0.0002 Square kilometres per person
in 2023
Papua New Guinea
0.0002 Square kilometres per person
in 2023
Israel rank
142nd
Papua New Guinea rank
140th

Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures, per capita over time

  • Israel
  • Papua New Guinea
0000.001196119922023

How they compare

Papua New Guinea currently reports 0.0002 Square kilometres per person against 0.0002 Square kilometres per person in Israel, a difference of 0 Square kilometres per person.

That makes Papua New Guinea's figure about 1.1 times Israel's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Israel ahead.

Israel ranks 142nd and Papua New Guinea ranks 140th of 167 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Israel averaged higher in 2 and Papua New Guinea in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Israel Papua New Guinea Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0005 Square kilometres per person 0.0003 Square kilometres per person 0.0001 Square kilometres per person Israel
1970s 0.0003 Square kilometres per person 0.0004 Square kilometres per person 0 Square kilometres per person Papua New Guinea
1980s 0.0003 Square kilometres per person 0.0003 Square kilometres per person 0 Square kilometres per person Israel
1990s 0.0003 Square kilometres per person 0.0003 Square kilometres per person 0.0001 Square kilometres per person Papua New Guinea
2000s 0.0002 Square kilometres per person 0.0003 Square kilometres per person 0.0001 Square kilometres per person Papua New Guinea
2010s 0.0002 Square kilometres per person 0.0002 Square kilometres per person 0 Square kilometres per person Papua New Guinea
2020s 0.0002 Square kilometres per person 0.0002 Square kilometres per person 0 Square kilometres per person Papua New Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher land use hidden — permanent meadows and pastures, per capita, Israel or Papua New Guinea?
Papua New Guinea, at 0.0002 Square kilometres per person against 0.0002 Square kilometres per person in Israel as of 2023.
What is the difference in land use hidden — permanent meadows and pastures, per capita between Israel and Papua New Guinea?
0 Square kilometres per person, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and Papua New Guinea?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Israel and Papua New Guinea rank globally for land use hidden — permanent meadows and pastures, per capita?
Israel ranks 142nd and Papua New Guinea ranks 140th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Israel vs Papua New Guinea: Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures, per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-permanent-meadows-and-pastures-per-capita/israel/papua-new-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-permanent-meadows-and-pastures-per-capita/israel/papua-new-guinea/">Israel vs Papua New Guinea: Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures, per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures, per capita
Unit
Square kilometres per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
167 places, 9,813 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.