Jamaica vs Liechtenstein: Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures, per capita

Jamaica
0.0008 Square kilometres per person
in 2023
Liechtenstein
0.0009 Square kilometres per person
in 2023
Jamaica rank
106th
Liechtenstein rank
103rd

Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures, per capita over time

  • Jamaica
  • Liechtenstein
0.0010.0020.0020.0030.003196119922023

How they compare

Liechtenstein currently reports 0.0009 Square kilometres per person against 0.0008 Square kilometres per person in Jamaica, a difference of 0.0001 Square kilometres per person.

That makes Liechtenstein's figure about 1.1 times Jamaica's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Liechtenstein ahead.

Jamaica ranks 106th and Liechtenstein ranks 103rd of 167 countries.

Liechtenstein has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Jamaica Liechtenstein Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0015 Square kilometres per person 0.0026 Square kilometres per person 0.0012 Square kilometres per person Liechtenstein
1970s 0.0013 Square kilometres per person 0.0021 Square kilometres per person 0.0009 Square kilometres per person Liechtenstein
1980s 0.0011 Square kilometres per person 0.0017 Square kilometres per person 0.0006 Square kilometres per person Liechtenstein
1990s 0.0009 Square kilometres per person 0.001 Square kilometres per person 0 Square kilometres per person Liechtenstein
2000s 0.0009 Square kilometres per person 0.001 Square kilometres per person 0.0001 Square kilometres per person Liechtenstein
2010s 0.0008 Square kilometres per person 0.0009 Square kilometres per person 0.0001 Square kilometres per person Liechtenstein
2020s 0.0008 Square kilometres per person 0.0009 Square kilometres per person 0.0001 Square kilometres per person Liechtenstein

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher land use hidden — permanent meadows and pastures, per capita, Jamaica or Liechtenstein?
Liechtenstein, at 0.0009 Square kilometres per person against 0.0008 Square kilometres per person in Jamaica as of 2023.
What is the difference in land use hidden — permanent meadows and pastures, per capita between Jamaica and Liechtenstein?
0.0001 Square kilometres per person, with Liechtenstein ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and Liechtenstein?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Jamaica and Liechtenstein rank globally for land use hidden — permanent meadows and pastures, per capita?
Jamaica ranks 106th and Liechtenstein ranks 103rd of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Jamaica vs Liechtenstein: Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures, per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-permanent-meadows-and-pastures-per-capita/jamaica/liechtenstein/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-permanent-meadows-and-pastures-per-capita/jamaica/liechtenstein/">Jamaica vs Liechtenstein: Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures, per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures, per capita
Unit
Square kilometres per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
167 places, 9,813 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.