Mexico vs New Caledonia: Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures, per capita

Mexico
0.0057 Square kilometres per person
in 2023
New Caledonia
0.006 Square kilometres per person
in 2023
Mexico rank
45th
New Caledonia rank
42nd

Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures, per capita over time

  • Mexico
  • New Caledonia
0.0050.010.0150.020.0250.03196119922023

How they compare

New Caledonia currently reports 0.006 Square kilometres per person against 0.0057 Square kilometres per person in Mexico, a difference of 0.0003 Square kilometres per person.

That makes New Caledonia's figure about 1.1 times Mexico's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was New Caledonia ahead.

Mexico ranks 45th and New Caledonia ranks 42nd of 167 countries.

New Caledonia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mexico New Caledonia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.018 Square kilometres per person 0.0269 Square kilometres per person 0.0089 Square kilometres per person New Caledonia
1970s 0.0135 Square kilometres per person 0.0191 Square kilometres per person 0.0056 Square kilometres per person New Caledonia
1980s 0.0108 Square kilometres per person 0.0157 Square kilometres per person 0.0048 Square kilometres per person New Caledonia
1990s 0.0091 Square kilometres per person 0.0112 Square kilometres per person 0.0021 Square kilometres per person New Caledonia
2000s 0.0076 Square kilometres per person 0.0092 Square kilometres per person 0.0016 Square kilometres per person New Caledonia
2010s 0.0062 Square kilometres per person 0.0064 Square kilometres per person 0.0001 Square kilometres per person New Caledonia
2020s 0.0058 Square kilometres per person 0.0061 Square kilometres per person 0.0003 Square kilometres per person New Caledonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher land use hidden — permanent meadows and pastures, per capita, Mexico or New Caledonia?
New Caledonia, at 0.006 Square kilometres per person against 0.0057 Square kilometres per person in Mexico as of 2023.
What is the difference in land use hidden — permanent meadows and pastures, per capita between Mexico and New Caledonia?
0.0003 Square kilometres per person, with New Caledonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and New Caledonia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Mexico and New Caledonia rank globally for land use hidden — permanent meadows and pastures, per capita?
Mexico ranks 45th and New Caledonia ranks 42nd of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mexico vs New Caledonia: Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures, per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-permanent-meadows-and-pastures-per-capita/mexico/new-caledonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-permanent-meadows-and-pastures-per-capita/mexico/new-caledonia/">Mexico vs New Caledonia: Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures, per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures, per capita
Unit
Square kilometres per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
167 places, 9,813 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.