Pakistan vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures, per capita

Pakistan
0.0002 Square kilometres per person
in 2023
Saint Kitts and Nevis
0.0002 Square kilometres per person
in 2023
Pakistan rank
135th
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
138th

Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures, per capita over time

  • Pakistan
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
000.0010.0010.001196119922023

How they compare

Pakistan currently reports 0.0002 Square kilometres per person against 0.0002 Square kilometres per person in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 0 Square kilometres per person.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Pakistan ahead.

Pakistan ranks 135th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 138th of 167 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Pakistan averaged higher in 6 and Saint Kitts and Nevis in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Pakistan Saint Kitts and Nevis Difference Ahead
1960s 0.001 Square kilometres per person 0.0008 Square kilometres per person 0.0002 Square kilometres per person Pakistan
1970s 0.0007 Square kilometres per person 0.0002 Square kilometres per person 0.0005 Square kilometres per person Pakistan
1980s 0.0005 Square kilometres per person 0.0002 Square kilometres per person 0.0003 Square kilometres per person Pakistan
1990s 0.0004 Square kilometres per person 0.0005 Square kilometres per person 0.0001 Square kilometres per person Saint Kitts and Nevis
2000s 0.0003 Square kilometres per person 0.0003 Square kilometres per person 0 Square kilometres per person Pakistan
2010s 0.0002 Square kilometres per person 0.0002 Square kilometres per person 0 Square kilometres per person Pakistan
2020s 0.0002 Square kilometres per person 0.0002 Square kilometres per person 0 Square kilometres per person Pakistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher land use hidden — permanent meadows and pastures, per capita, Pakistan or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
Pakistan, at 0.0002 Square kilometres per person against 0.0002 Square kilometres per person in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2023.
What is the difference in land use hidden — permanent meadows and pastures, per capita between Pakistan and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
0 Square kilometres per person, with Pakistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Pakistan and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Pakistan and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for land use hidden — permanent meadows and pastures, per capita?
Pakistan ranks 135th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 138th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Pakistan vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures, per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-permanent-meadows-and-pastures-per-capita/pakistan/st-kitts-and-nevis/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-permanent-meadows-and-pastures-per-capita/pakistan/st-kitts-and-nevis/">Pakistan vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures, per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures, per capita
Unit
Square kilometres per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
167 places, 9,813 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.