Belarus vs Chile: Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures, per square kilometre

Belarus
0.1173 Square kilometres per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile
0.1182 Square kilometres per square kilometre
in 2023
Belarus rank
99th
Chile rank
98th

Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures, per square kilometre over time

  • Belarus
  • Chile
00.050.10.150.2196119922023

How they compare

Chile currently reports 0.1182 Square kilometres per square kilometre against 0.1173 Square kilometres per square kilometre in Belarus, a difference of 0.0009 Square kilometres per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Chile ahead.

Belarus ranks 99th and Chile ranks 98th of 167 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 1 and Chile in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Chile Difference Ahead
1990s 0.1484 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.1737 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0252 Square kilometres per square kilometre Chile
2000s 0.1603 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.1828 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0225 Square kilometres per square kilometre Chile
2010s 0.1422 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.1509 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0087 Square kilometres per square kilometre Chile
2020s 0.1201 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.1195 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0006 Square kilometres per square kilometre Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher land use hidden — permanent meadows and pastures, per square kilometre, Belarus or Chile?
Chile, at 0.1182 Square kilometres per square kilometre against 0.1173 Square kilometres per square kilometre in Belarus as of 2023.
What is the difference in land use hidden — permanent meadows and pastures, per square kilometre between Belarus and Chile?
0.0009 Square kilometres per square kilometre, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Chile?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Belarus and Chile rank globally for land use hidden — permanent meadows and pastures, per square kilometre?
Belarus ranks 99th and Chile ranks 98th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Chile: Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-permanent-meadows-and-pastures-per-square-kilometre/belarus/chile/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-permanent-meadows-and-pastures-per-square-kilometre/belarus/chile/">Belarus vs Chile: Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures, per square kilometre
Unit
Square kilometres per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
167 places, 9,813 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.