Hong Kong vs Japan: Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures, per square kilometre

Hong Kong
0.0095 Square kilometres per square kilometre
in 2023
Japan
0.0085 Square kilometres per square kilometre
in 2023
Hong Kong rank
150th
Japan rank
152nd

Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures, per square kilometre over time

  • Hong Kong
  • Japan
0.010.0150.020.0250.03196119922023

How they compare

Hong Kong currently reports 0.0095 Square kilometres per square kilometre against 0.0085 Square kilometres per square kilometre in Japan, a difference of 0.001 Square kilometres per square kilometre.

That makes Hong Kong's figure about 1.1 times Japan's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 44 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Japan ahead.

Hong Kong ranks 150th and Japan ranks 152nd of 167 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Hong Kong averaged higher in 2 and Japan in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong Japan Difference Ahead
1980s 0.0101 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0176 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0075 Square kilometres per square kilometre Japan
1990s 0.0098 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0145 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0047 Square kilometres per square kilometre Japan
2000s 0.0095 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0108 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0013 Square kilometres per square kilometre Japan
2010s 0.0095 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0095 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0001 Square kilometres per square kilometre Hong Kong
2020s 0.0095 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0085 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.001 Square kilometres per square kilometre Hong Kong

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher land use hidden — permanent meadows and pastures, per square kilometre, Hong Kong or Japan?
Hong Kong, at 0.0095 Square kilometres per square kilometre against 0.0085 Square kilometres per square kilometre in Japan as of 2023.
What is the difference in land use hidden — permanent meadows and pastures, per square kilometre between Hong Kong and Japan?
0.001 Square kilometres per square kilometre, with Hong Kong ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and Japan?
44 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2023.
How do Hong Kong and Japan rank globally for land use hidden — permanent meadows and pastures, per square kilometre?
Hong Kong ranks 150th and Japan ranks 152nd of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong vs Japan: Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-permanent-meadows-and-pastures-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/japan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-permanent-meadows-and-pastures-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/japan/">Hong Kong vs Japan: Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures, per square kilometre
Unit
Square kilometres per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
167 places, 9,813 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.