Hong Kong vs Sweden: Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures, per square kilometre

Hong Kong
0.0095 Square kilometres per square kilometre
in 2023
Sweden
0.0111 Square kilometres per square kilometre
in 2023
Hong Kong rank
150th
Sweden rank
148th

Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures, per square kilometre over time

  • Hong Kong
  • Sweden
00.0050.010.0150.02196119922023

How they compare

Sweden currently reports 0.0111 Square kilometres per square kilometre against 0.0095 Square kilometres per square kilometre in Hong Kong, a difference of 0.0016 Square kilometres per square kilometre.

That makes Sweden's figure about 1.2 times Hong Kong's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 44 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Sweden ahead.

Hong Kong ranks 150th and Sweden ranks 148th of 167 countries.

Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong Sweden Difference Ahead
1980s 0.0101 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0156 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0055 Square kilometres per square kilometre Sweden
1990s 0.0098 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0128 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.003 Square kilometres per square kilometre Sweden
2000s 0.0095 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0113 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0018 Square kilometres per square kilometre Sweden
2010s 0.0095 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.011 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0015 Square kilometres per square kilometre Sweden
2020s 0.0095 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0113 Square kilometres per square kilometre 0.0018 Square kilometres per square kilometre Sweden

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher land use hidden — permanent meadows and pastures, per square kilometre, Hong Kong or Sweden?
Sweden, at 0.0111 Square kilometres per square kilometre against 0.0095 Square kilometres per square kilometre in Hong Kong as of 2023.
What is the difference in land use hidden — permanent meadows and pastures, per square kilometre between Hong Kong and Sweden?
0.0016 Square kilometres per square kilometre, with Sweden ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and Sweden?
44 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2023.
How do Hong Kong and Sweden rank globally for land use hidden — permanent meadows and pastures, per square kilometre?
Hong Kong ranks 150th and Sweden ranks 148th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong vs Sweden: Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-permanent-meadows-and-pastures-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-permanent-meadows-and-pastures-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/sweden/">Hong Kong vs Sweden: Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures, per square kilometre
Unit
Square kilometres per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
167 places, 9,813 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.