Australia vs South Africa: Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures, per unit of GDP

Australia
0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP
in 2023
South Africa
0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Australia rank
34th
South Africa rank
31st

Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures, per unit of GDP over time

  • Australia
  • South Africa
000000196119922023

How they compare

South Africa currently reports 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP against 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP in Australia, a difference of 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP.

That makes South Africa's figure about 1.1 times Australia's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Australia ahead.

Australia ranks 34th and South Africa ranks 31st of 165 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 6 and South Africa in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia South Africa Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0002 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP 0.0001 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP 0.0001 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP Australia
1970s 0.0001 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP Australia
1980s 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP Australia
1990s 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP Australia
2000s 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP Australia
2010s 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP Australia
2020s 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP South Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher land use hidden — permanent meadows and pastures, per unit of gdp, Australia or South Africa?
South Africa, at 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP against 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP in Australia as of 2023.
What is the difference in land use hidden — permanent meadows and pastures, per unit of gdp between Australia and South Africa?
0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP, with South Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and South Africa?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Australia and South Africa rank globally for land use hidden — permanent meadows and pastures, per unit of gdp?
Australia ranks 34th and South Africa ranks 31st of 165 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs South Africa: Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures, per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-permanent-meadows-and-pastures-per-unit-of-gdp/australia/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-permanent-meadows-and-pastures-per-unit-of-gdp/australia/south-africa/">Australia vs South Africa: Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures, per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures, per unit of GDP
Unit
Square kilometres per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
165 places, 8,856 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.