Belize vs New Caledonia: Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures, per unit of GDP

Belize
0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP
in 2023
New Caledonia
0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Belize rank
89th
New Caledonia rank
88th

Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures, per unit of GDP over time

  • Belize
  • New Caledonia
0000196119922023

How they compare

New Caledonia currently reports 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP against 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP in Belize, a difference of 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP.

That makes New Caledonia's figure about 1.1 times Belize's.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 59 shared years of data; in 1965 it was New Caledonia ahead.

Belize ranks 89th and New Caledonia ranks 88th of 165 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Belize averaged higher in 3 and New Caledonia in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belize New Caledonia Difference Ahead
1960s 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP New Caledonia
1970s 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP Belize
1980s 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP New Caledonia
1990s 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP New Caledonia
2000s 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP New Caledonia
2010s 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP Belize
2020s 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP Belize

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher land use hidden — permanent meadows and pastures, per unit of gdp, Belize or New Caledonia?
New Caledonia, at 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP against 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP in Belize as of 2023.
What is the difference in land use hidden — permanent meadows and pastures, per unit of gdp between Belize and New Caledonia?
0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP, with New Caledonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belize and New Caledonia?
59 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2023.
How do Belize and New Caledonia rank globally for land use hidden — permanent meadows and pastures, per unit of gdp?
Belize ranks 89th and New Caledonia ranks 88th of 165 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belize vs New Caledonia: Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures, per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-permanent-meadows-and-pastures-per-unit-of-gdp/belize/new-caledonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-permanent-meadows-and-pastures-per-unit-of-gdp/belize/new-caledonia/">Belize vs New Caledonia: Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures, per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures, per unit of GDP
Unit
Square kilometres per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
165 places, 8,856 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.