Cameroon vs New Zealand: Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures, per unit of GDP

Cameroon
0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP
in 2023
New Zealand
0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Cameroon rank
69th
New Zealand rank
70th

Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures, per unit of GDP over time

  • Cameroon
  • New Zealand
0000196119922023

How they compare

Cameroon currently reports 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP against 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP in New Zealand, a difference of 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP.

That makes Cameroon's figure about 1.2 times New Zealand's.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cameroon ahead.

Cameroon ranks 69th and New Zealand ranks 70th of 165 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Cameroon averaged higher in 3 and New Zealand in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cameroon New Zealand Difference Ahead
1960s 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP Cameroon
1970s 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP New Zealand
1980s 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP New Zealand
1990s 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP New Zealand
2000s 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP New Zealand
2010s 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP Cameroon
2020s 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP Cameroon

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher land use hidden — permanent meadows and pastures, per unit of gdp, Cameroon or New Zealand?
Cameroon, at 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP against 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP in New Zealand as of 2023.
What is the difference in land use hidden — permanent meadows and pastures, per unit of gdp between Cameroon and New Zealand?
0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP, with Cameroon ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cameroon and New Zealand?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Cameroon and New Zealand rank globally for land use hidden — permanent meadows and pastures, per unit of gdp?
Cameroon ranks 69th and New Zealand ranks 70th of 165 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cameroon vs New Zealand: Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures, per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-permanent-meadows-and-pastures-per-unit-of-gdp/cameroon/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-permanent-meadows-and-pastures-per-unit-of-gdp/cameroon/new-zealand/">Cameroon vs New Zealand: Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures, per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures, per unit of GDP
Unit
Square kilometres per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
165 places, 8,856 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.