Canada vs United States: Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures, per unit of GDP

Canada
0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP
in 2023
United States
0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Canada rank
104th
United States rank
101st

Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures, per unit of GDP over time

  • Canada
  • United States
0000196119922023

How they compare

United States currently reports 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP against 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP in Canada, a difference of 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP.

That makes United States's figure about 1.1 times Canada's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Canada ahead.

Canada ranks 104th and United States ranks 101st of 165 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Canada averaged higher in 4 and United States in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Canada United States Difference Ahead
1960s 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP Canada
1970s 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP Canada
1980s 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP United States
1990s 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP Canada
2000s 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP Canada
2010s 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP United States
2020s 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP United States

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher land use hidden — permanent meadows and pastures, per unit of gdp, Canada or United States?
United States, at 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP against 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP in Canada as of 2023.
What is the difference in land use hidden — permanent meadows and pastures, per unit of gdp between Canada and United States?
0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP, with United States ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and United States?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Canada and United States rank globally for land use hidden — permanent meadows and pastures, per unit of gdp?
Canada ranks 104th and United States ranks 101st of 165 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Canada vs United States: Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures, per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-permanent-meadows-and-pastures-per-unit-of-gdp/canada/united-states/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-permanent-meadows-and-pastures-per-unit-of-gdp/canada/united-states/">Canada vs United States: Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures, per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures, per unit of GDP
Unit
Square kilometres per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
165 places, 8,856 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.