New Caledonia vs Pakistan: Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures, per unit of GDP

New Caledonia
0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Pakistan
0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP
in 2023
New Caledonia rank
88th
Pakistan rank
91st

Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures, per unit of GDP over time

  • New Caledonia
  • Pakistan
0000196119922023

How they compare

New Caledonia currently reports 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP against 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP in Pakistan, a difference of 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP.

That makes New Caledonia's figure about 1.2 times Pakistan's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 59 shared years of data; in 1965 it was New Caledonia ahead.

New Caledonia ranks 88th and Pakistan ranks 91st of 165 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, New Caledonia averaged higher in 5 and Pakistan in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade New Caledonia Pakistan Difference Ahead
1960s 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP New Caledonia
1970s 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP Pakistan
1980s 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP New Caledonia
1990s 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP Pakistan
2000s 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP New Caledonia
2010s 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP New Caledonia
2020s 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP New Caledonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher land use hidden — permanent meadows and pastures, per unit of gdp, New Caledonia or Pakistan?
New Caledonia, at 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP against 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP in Pakistan as of 2023.
What is the difference in land use hidden — permanent meadows and pastures, per unit of gdp between New Caledonia and Pakistan?
0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP, with New Caledonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Caledonia and Pakistan?
59 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2023.
How do New Caledonia and Pakistan rank globally for land use hidden — permanent meadows and pastures, per unit of gdp?
New Caledonia ranks 88th and Pakistan ranks 91st of 165 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

New Caledonia vs Pakistan: Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures, per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-permanent-meadows-and-pastures-per-unit-of-gdp/new-caledonia/pakistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-permanent-meadows-and-pastures-per-unit-of-gdp/new-caledonia/pakistan/">New Caledonia vs Pakistan: Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures, per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures, per unit of GDP
Unit
Square kilometres per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
165 places, 8,856 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.