Norway vs Trinidad and Tobago: Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures, per unit of GDP

Norway
0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Trinidad and Tobago
0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Norway rank
149th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
152nd

Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures, per unit of GDP over time

  • Norway
  • Trinidad and Tobago
0000196119922023

How they compare

Norway currently reports 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP against 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP.

That makes Norway's figure about 1.3 times Trinidad and Tobago's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Norway ahead.

Norway ranks 149th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 152nd of 165 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Norway averaged higher in 6 and Trinidad and Tobago in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Norway Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
1960s 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP Norway
1970s 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP Norway
1980s 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP Norway
1990s 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP Trinidad and Tobago
2000s 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP Norway
2010s 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP Norway
2020s 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP Norway

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher land use hidden — permanent meadows and pastures, per unit of gdp, Norway or Trinidad and Tobago?
Norway, at 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP against 0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2023.
What is the difference in land use hidden — permanent meadows and pastures, per unit of gdp between Norway and Trinidad and Tobago?
0 Square kilometres per US$ of GDP, with Norway ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Norway and Trinidad and Tobago?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Norway and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for land use hidden — permanent meadows and pastures, per unit of gdp?
Norway ranks 149th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 152nd of 165 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Norway vs Trinidad and Tobago: Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures, per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-permanent-meadows-and-pastures-per-unit-of-gdp/norway/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-permanent-meadows-and-pastures-per-unit-of-gdp/norway/trinidad-and-tobago/">Norway vs Trinidad and Tobago: Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures, per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures, per unit of GDP
Unit
Square kilometres per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
165 places, 8,856 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.