Australia vs OECD: Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures

Australia
3.32 million Square kilometres
in 2023
OECD
8.22 million Square kilometres
in 2023
Australia rank
3rd
OECD rank
1st

Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures over time

  • Australia
  • OECD
4.0M6.0M8.0M10.0M196119922023

How they compare

OECD currently reports 8.22 million Square kilometres against 3.32 million Square kilometres in Australia, a difference of 4.90 million Square kilometres.

That makes OECD's figure about 2.5 times Australia's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, OECD has been ahead every year.

Australia ranks 3rd and OECD ranks 1st of 180 countries.

OECD has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia OECD Difference Ahead
1960s 4.71 million Square kilometres 9.41 million Square kilometres 4.70 million Square kilometres OECD
1970s 4.81 million Square kilometres 9.34 million Square kilometres 4.53 million Square kilometres OECD
1980s 4.62 million Square kilometres 9.09 million Square kilometres 4.47 million Square kilometres OECD
1990s 4.44 million Square kilometres 8.89 million Square kilometres 4.45 million Square kilometres OECD
2000s 3.94 million Square kilometres 8.85 million Square kilometres 4.91 million Square kilometres OECD
2010s 3.38 million Square kilometres 8.37 million Square kilometres 4.99 million Square kilometres OECD
2020s 3.30 million Square kilometres 8.23 million Square kilometres 4.93 million Square kilometres OECD

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher land use hidden — permanent meadows and pastures, Australia or OECD?
OECD, at 8.22 million Square kilometres against 3.32 million Square kilometres in Australia as of 2023.
What is the difference in land use hidden — permanent meadows and pastures between Australia and OECD?
4.90 million Square kilometres, with OECD ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and OECD?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Australia and OECD rank globally for land use hidden — permanent meadows and pastures?
Australia ranks 3rd and OECD ranks 1st of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs OECD: Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-permanent-meadows-and-pastures/australia/oecd/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-permanent-meadows-and-pastures/australia/oecd/">Australia vs OECD: Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures
Unit
Square kilometres
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
207 places, 11,927 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Land resources are one of the four components of the natural environment: water, air, land and living resources. In this context land is both: a physical "milieu" necessary for the development of natural vegetation as well as cultivated vegetation; a resource for human activities. The data presented here give information concerning land use state and changes (e.g. agricultural land, forest land). Data source(s): Food and Agriculture Organization of the U.N., (FAOSTAT) Contact: ENV.Stat@oecd.org Dataset release date: June 3, 2024 Database documentation Countries metadata