Chile vs Eritrea: Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures

Chile
87,836 Square kilometres
in 2023
Eritrea
69,000 Square kilometres
in 2023
Chile rank
52nd
Eritrea rank
54th

Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures over time

  • Chile
  • Eritrea
050.0k100.0k150.0k196119922023

How they compare

Chile currently reports 87,836 Square kilometres against 69,000 Square kilometres in Eritrea, a difference of 18,836 Square kilometres.

That makes Chile's figure about 1.3 times Eritrea's.

Across all 31 years both countries report, Chile has been ahead every year.

Chile ranks 52nd and Eritrea ranks 54th of 180 countries.

Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Eritrea Difference Ahead
1990s 129,203 Square kilometres 69,574 Square kilometres 59,629 Square kilometres Chile
2000s 135,918 Square kilometres 69,268 Square kilometres 66,650 Square kilometres Chile
2010s 112,116 Square kilometres 69,000 Square kilometres 43,116 Square kilometres Chile
2020s 88,770 Square kilometres 69,000 Square kilometres 19,770 Square kilometres Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher land use hidden — permanent meadows and pastures, Chile or Eritrea?
Chile, at 87,836 Square kilometres against 69,000 Square kilometres in Eritrea as of 2023.
What is the difference in land use hidden — permanent meadows and pastures between Chile and Eritrea?
18,836 Square kilometres, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Eritrea?
31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Chile and Eritrea rank globally for land use hidden — permanent meadows and pastures?
Chile ranks 52nd and Eritrea ranks 54th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Eritrea: Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-permanent-meadows-and-pastures/chile/eritrea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-permanent-meadows-and-pastures/chile/eritrea/">Chile vs Eritrea: Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures
Unit
Square kilometres
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
207 places, 11,927 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Land resources are one of the four components of the natural environment: water, air, land and living resources. In this context land is both: a physical "milieu" necessary for the development of natural vegetation as well as cultivated vegetation; a resource for human activities. The data presented here give information concerning land use state and changes (e.g. agricultural land, forest land). Data source(s): Food and Agriculture Organization of the U.N., (FAOSTAT) Contact: ENV.Stat@oecd.org Dataset release date: June 3, 2024 Database documentation Countries metadata