Eritrea vs Uganda: Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures

Eritrea
69,000 Square kilometres
in 2023
Uganda
53,150 Square kilometres
in 2023
Eritrea rank
54th
Uganda rank
57th

Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures over time

  • Eritrea
  • Uganda
020.0k40.0k60.0k196119922023

How they compare

Eritrea currently reports 69,000 Square kilometres against 53,150 Square kilometres in Uganda, a difference of 15,850 Square kilometres.

That makes Eritrea's figure about 1.3 times Uganda's.

Across all 31 years both countries report, Eritrea has been ahead every year.

Eritrea ranks 54th and Uganda ranks 57th of 180 countries.

Eritrea has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eritrea Uganda Difference Ahead
1990s 69,574 Square kilometres 51,120 Square kilometres 18,454 Square kilometres Eritrea
2000s 69,268 Square kilometres 51,628 Square kilometres 17,640 Square kilometres Eritrea
2010s 69,000 Square kilometres 53,150 Square kilometres 15,850 Square kilometres Eritrea
2020s 69,000 Square kilometres 53,150 Square kilometres 15,850 Square kilometres Eritrea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher land use hidden — permanent meadows and pastures, Eritrea or Uganda?
Eritrea, at 69,000 Square kilometres against 53,150 Square kilometres in Uganda as of 2023.
What is the difference in land use hidden — permanent meadows and pastures between Eritrea and Uganda?
15,850 Square kilometres, with Eritrea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Uganda?
31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Eritrea and Uganda rank globally for land use hidden — permanent meadows and pastures?
Eritrea ranks 54th and Uganda ranks 57th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eritrea vs Uganda: Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-permanent-meadows-and-pastures/eritrea/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-permanent-meadows-and-pastures/eritrea/uganda/">Eritrea vs Uganda: Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures
Unit
Square kilometres
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
207 places, 11,927 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Land resources are one of the four components of the natural environment: water, air, land and living resources. In this context land is both: a physical "milieu" necessary for the development of natural vegetation as well as cultivated vegetation; a resource for human activities. The data presented here give information concerning land use state and changes (e.g. agricultural land, forest land). Data source(s): Food and Agriculture Organization of the U.N., (FAOSTAT) Contact: ENV.Stat@oecd.org Dataset release date: June 3, 2024 Database documentation Countries metadata