Ethiopia vs OECD Asia Oceania: Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures

Ethiopia
200,000 Square kilometres
in 2023
OECD Asia Oceania
3.42 million Square kilometres
in 2023
Ethiopia rank
3rd
OECD Asia Oceania rank
2nd

Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures over time

  • Ethiopia
  • OECD Asia Oceania
01.0M2.0M3.0M4.0M199320082023

How they compare

OECD Asia Oceania currently reports 3.42 million Square kilometres against 200,000 Square kilometres in Ethiopia, a difference of 3.22 million Square kilometres.

That makes OECD Asia Oceania's figure about 17.1 times Ethiopia's.

Across all 24 years both countries report, OECD Asia Oceania has been ahead every year.

Ethiopia ranks 3rd and OECD Asia Oceania ranks 2nd of 12 countries.

OECD Asia Oceania has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ethiopia OECD Asia Oceania Difference Ahead
2000s 200,000 Square kilometres 4.05 million Square kilometres 3.85 million Square kilometres OECD Asia Oceania
2010s 200,000 Square kilometres 3.49 million Square kilometres 3.29 million Square kilometres OECD Asia Oceania
2020s 200,000 Square kilometres 3.40 million Square kilometres 3.20 million Square kilometres OECD Asia Oceania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher land use hidden — permanent meadows and pastures, Ethiopia or OECD Asia Oceania?
OECD Asia Oceania, at 3.42 million Square kilometres against 200,000 Square kilometres in Ethiopia as of 2023.
What is the difference in land use hidden — permanent meadows and pastures between Ethiopia and OECD Asia Oceania?
3.22 million Square kilometres, with OECD Asia Oceania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and OECD Asia Oceania?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Ethiopia and OECD Asia Oceania rank globally for land use hidden — permanent meadows and pastures?
Ethiopia ranks 3rd and OECD Asia Oceania ranks 2nd of 12 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ethiopia vs OECD Asia Oceania: Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-permanent-meadows-and-pastures/ethiopia-2/oecd-asia-oceania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-permanent-meadows-and-pastures/ethiopia-2/oecd-asia-oceania/">Ethiopia vs OECD Asia Oceania: Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures
Unit
Square kilometres
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
207 places, 11,927 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Land resources are one of the four components of the natural environment: water, air, land and living resources. In this context land is both: a physical "milieu" necessary for the development of natural vegetation as well as cultivated vegetation; a resource for human activities. The data presented here give information concerning land use state and changes (e.g. agricultural land, forest land). Data source(s): Food and Agriculture Organization of the U.N., (FAOSTAT) Contact: ENV.Stat@oecd.org Dataset release date: June 3, 2024 Database documentation Countries metadata