Lesotho vs OECD America: Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures

Lesotho
20,000 Square kilometres
in 2023
OECD America
4.05 million Square kilometres
in 2023
Lesotho rank
4th
OECD America rank
1st

Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures over time

  • Lesotho
  • OECD America
01.0M2.0M3.0M4.0M196119922023

How they compare

OECD America currently reports 4.05 million Square kilometres against 20,000 Square kilometres in Lesotho, a difference of 4.03 million Square kilometres.

That makes OECD America's figure about 202.4 times Lesotho's.

Across all 24 years both countries report, OECD America has been ahead every year.

Lesotho ranks 4th and OECD America ranks 1st of 12 countries.

OECD America has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lesotho OECD America Difference Ahead
2000s 20,000 Square kilometres 3.98 million Square kilometres 3.96 million Square kilometres OECD America
2010s 20,000 Square kilometres 4.12 million Square kilometres 4.10 million Square kilometres OECD America
2020s 20,000 Square kilometres 4.07 million Square kilometres 4.05 million Square kilometres OECD America

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher land use hidden — permanent meadows and pastures, Lesotho or OECD America?
OECD America, at 4.05 million Square kilometres against 20,000 Square kilometres in Lesotho as of 2023.
What is the difference in land use hidden — permanent meadows and pastures between Lesotho and OECD America?
4.03 million Square kilometres, with OECD America ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lesotho and OECD America?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Lesotho and OECD America rank globally for land use hidden — permanent meadows and pastures?
Lesotho ranks 4th and OECD America ranks 1st of 12 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lesotho vs OECD America: Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-permanent-meadows-and-pastures/lesotho-2/oecd-america-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-hidden-permanent-meadows-and-pastures/lesotho-2/oecd-america-2/">Lesotho vs OECD America: Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Land use hidden — Permanent meadows and pastures
Unit
Square kilometres
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
207 places, 11,927 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Land resources are one of the four components of the natural environment: water, air, land and living resources. In this context land is both: a physical "milieu" necessary for the development of natural vegetation as well as cultivated vegetation; a resource for human activities. The data presented here give information concerning land use state and changes (e.g. agricultural land, forest land). Data source(s): Food and Agriculture Organization of the U.N., (FAOSTAT) Contact: ENV.Stat@oecd.org Dataset release date: June 3, 2024 Database documentation Countries metadata